Because they are using stories written by other news organizations that have been provided to the AP for redistribution. This allows news providers to share the writing of on-site reporters in the location where news happens.
Nothing sinister - just efficiency.
The news providers can edit by removing parts of the article, so that accounts for the differences.
""The Associated Press, or AP, is an American news agency, and is the world's largest such organization. The AP is a cooperative owned by its contributing newspapers, radio and television stations in the United States, who both contribute stories to it and use material written by its staffers. Many newspapers and broadcasters outside the United States are AP subscribers — that is, they pay a fee to use AP material but are not members of the cooperative.""
2007-11-12 02:51:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The dichotomy between media communities like fox information and msnbc alongside party lines isn't a sparkling phenomenon by making use of any potential. as an issue of actuality, our earliest varieties of media (newspapers) owe their very life to partisan politics. 2 party politics in this united states began while Thomas Jefferson and James Madison shaped the Democratic-Republican party in 1791 and Alexander Hamilton and John Adams shaped the Federalist party. the two a style of events had their very own newspapers. decrease back then, John Adams had surpassed the Alien-Sedition acts because of the fact of an apprehension this united states had of the French. decrease back then it could have been the equivalent of the Patriot Act at present. you ought to be detained for speaking out against the government and referred to as a French secret agent. Thomas Jefferson used newspapers to communicate out fervently a criminal offense. that's believed that this become a important reason at the back of Adams failure to be elected to a 2d term. Jefferson gained the hotly contested election instead. Jefferson confident the folk of the U. S. that John Adams become going to attack and pass to conflict with France. This, of direction, become unfaithful. Jefferson's smear strategies gained the day nonetheless. right this is an occasion of the newspaper articles those 2 could write approximately one yet another. fairly loopy stuff, and that's between 2 people who have been super pals their finished lives. So, those claims that Fox information and others are some how in charge for the incorrect information of the yank public is patently fake. in actuality, human beings are by using making use of in super too lazy to pass out and analyze the reality for themselves. In our protection inspite of the undeniable fact that, we've the internet now. the internet is nearly a wild west of tips, the place actually something may be stated and no person has to decrease back it up with analyze data or citations of any style. i'm in basic terms approximately particular i ought to declare Obama is a secret werewolf and somebody someplace could have faith it with out being presented any data. So, i assume the final analysis is..... it is not important which you study, and it is not important which you hold up with modern activities. extra important is which you question what you study and question what you're being advised approximately modern activities. stable success!!
2016-11-11 06:11:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ritzer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's intentional.
The major newsgroups coordinate the daily news in the USA to brainwash the masses in a fashion their owners/the powers that be want.
That's why once a year or so there are articles about big stories which have been intentionally censored/crushed by the political powers that be to assure business as usual/full steam ahead so to speak (my view).
2007-11-12 02:51:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Once upon a time there were many news outlets, now there are about 6. And the FCC wants to allow them to merge into even fewer outlets.
2007-11-12 02:49:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Holy Cow! 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Too broke and lazy to hire their own reporters; look for the preponderance of "news" reported out of the AP. And the stuff from the AP is relentlessly left wing, to boot. Of course, I'm shocked, just shocked by this fact!
2007-11-12 02:44:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
And most of the stories themselves identical. Most stories come from the A.P.
2007-11-12 02:40:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
If that seems weird, try answering this.....if they all report the same information generally, then why do we have our favorite news station, channel?
2007-11-12 02:42:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋