Why dont Bush look for a diplomatic solution to wadever problems he cause/start?

Question

Hey Bush supporters answer the question plz.Dont seek an excuse for not answering cause u know its too embarassing

Answer 1

Because he "doesnt negotiate with terrorist".
No idea what that means he do it with Cheney,blackwater and Israel all the time

Answer 2

Because, bush0 is a republican. A cowboy, macho rep. in whom his policies are based on:
Shoot first, Ask later so to speak!!

Allow me to give you bit of an advise.

Don't EVER try to put some sense in these bush0 lovers or expect any rational responses!!

They're facetious filled with feeble explanations.
Like robots say the same things over and over again!!
Even if, all the facts and documents are provided!
They're BRAIN WASHED.

As you notice, they're all being usual cons!!
Looking for misspelled words, grammar and other nonsenses!!

How pathetic is that?!!

Answer 3

What are you referring to? In Iraq, diplomacy was tried by the US, the UK, France and the United Nations for over ten years to no avail. Are we to believe that another ten would be the charm?

The world has a long history of what happens when diplomacy is attempted with tyrants hell bent on world domination. The record is not very impressive. Does the name Neville Chamberlain ring a bell?

Sometimes diplomacy is useful as a solution. Most of the time it is useful as an excuse for inaction.
.

Answer 4

Seems to me that the diplomatic solution he employed with North Korea has worked pretty well.

They have stopped the nuke program. The US unfroze their assets and they have signed trade agreements with the South and got tons of free diesel fuel for their trouble.

Bush entered into diplomatic talks with Russia and signed yet another nuclear arms reduction treaty.

Is that what you mean?

Answer 5

I'm sorry, but the question seems to be written in some foreign language to the English language. "Wadever"? Really? You want us to take your question seriously when you have no sense of grammar or spelling? I tell you what, I'll try to answer it, at least what sense I can make of it. Bush has always sought diplomatic solutions, he just knows when diplomacy stops working.

Answer 6

Look at the polls today and you might think our president is a failure, with the media's hostility toward him. His party lost both houses of Congress in the last election. But, if you think for one minute, you may find that George Bush's presidency may turn out to be one of the most important of our times.

Not only facing an unprecedented attack on America, our homeland. How was he to use diplomacy then?

I believe he resonded with an ambitious effort to remake things right in the world, even with all it's setbacks, this effort just might succeed!

How many years of diplomacy was used with Saddam Hussein? 11, 12, 14, and he still threatened to have WMD's?

There are times when he did do the talk. But then it's time to walk the walk! He has done both with diplomacy first!

.

Answer 7

You mean like going to the UN and getting 17 resolutions passed against Iraq, which Iraq ignored. Or do you mean involving the world community in sanctions to try to get Iraq to change course. Or perhaps you mean the ultimatum that was issued to Iraq after they violated the surrender agreement and fired on US warplanes in the no fly zone? Was that what you meant?

Answer 8

Because that would entail actually thinking problems through instead of simply reacting to them.

Answer 9

diplomacy is against republicans policy!

they want, blood, blood..........

Answer 10

because in the middle east you cant deal with radicals, if you are a Cristian and read the Bible it will say that through people will be against there brother for all of the worlds history