...his desire go to war with Iraq?
2007-11-12 00:21:38 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes, I think him and Bush should be tried. Hitler took his people to war for a wrong reason and would have been tried if he was captured so why don't we try British leaders who take the country to war for an unjustified reason?
2007-11-12 00:27:32 · answer #1 · answered by stardustlost87 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes, yes, yes!
According to polls at the time, at least 52% of UK was against miltary action. So where is the democracy? It's a standing joke, and infuriating humiliation for UK citizens. Day after ady we get the same old BS on the News and media, "NO rights without resposibilities." Well, we took the resposibility to direct our government and look what happened.
Interestingly, some commentators were showing what the eventual outcome would be when they advised that the determineation to invade Iraq would destabilise the middle east and cause resentment and chaos for generations to come. It started to become clear, with all the lies and sophistry, (e.g., Colin Powell's statement that weapons of mass destruction had been found by intelligence sources),
that by acts of aggression, US and UK hoped to trigger a conflagration in order to justify the attack. Such perverse and cynical logic leading to so many unecessary loss of lives must be accounted for and Blair, Bush, and the Cabal, and all the warmongers should stand for trial.
Even if these morons (polite expression), are not indicted they should at least be publicly shamed.
2007-11-12 00:40:29 · answer #2 · answered by luc ormer 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The mess we are in began with smarmy tony blair and his human rights grasping spouse. The years of labour have ruined the united kingdom. in the event that they hadnt been so undesirable then no one might have voted for the BNP, this is been completed as an extremely loud protest vote. If we could get an honest PM and trouble-free politicians then the BNP wouldnt be voted for lower back, and, no, i didnt vote for them.
2016-10-16 05:43:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definately
2007-11-12 02:11:53 · answer #4 · answered by trish 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The war with Iraq, sadly, can't be undone and think of the cost of yet another bloody enquiry
2007-11-12 00:29:01 · answer #5 · answered by reggie 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I have said this many times before.
The thing is that I believe that he did know that there where no WMD or they would not have sent unprotected men in.
If he didn't know then he should be up anyway for the attempted murder of his own troupes
2007-11-12 01:12:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would like to see that happen, but I don't think it will somehow.
The great British public are the last people to be considered in anything that happens to their own country.
2007-11-12 00:32:16 · answer #7 · answered by northern lass 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes he should of been next in the queue after saddam Hussein!
2007-11-13 09:51:13 · answer #8 · answered by stuartie74 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush lied first, then Lapdog copied. I can honestly say if one of these 2 men where murdered or died, i would laugh!
2007-11-12 00:35:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, he was legally voted in by the people and did what he thought was in their best interest. History might show us that it was not the wrong descision.
2007-11-12 00:30:50 · answer #10 · answered by Spiny Norman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋