No offence to Oprah but Just because she is a successful Tv show presenter doesn't mean she will be good at running a country as well, that too US. Nobody is good at everything.
I love her show and that's where i want to see her.
2007-11-10 22:52:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by sugar 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
properly, Turkey Pizza infant, or ought to I call you Ms. infant? Oprah for president? Why, in basic terms because of the fact she is familiar and has an wonderful promo group? the ordinary answer is "no" because of the fact she is a character and is not any longer qualified to steer a rustic dealing with nuclear threats from around the international. i be attentive to, Oprah ought to get the nutcase leaders of the countries that prefer us all ineffective and say, "Oh come on, fellas, Oprah do no longer prefer no nuclear stuff wiping out humanity. Come on, what say Oprah supply you all a sparkling Cadillac or in line with possibility even a style of states interior the midwest that have not got sophistication like Oprah do? Huh? hey, the place did they pass?" Oprah did no longer do something for the folk hit by making use of Katrina. She took her instruct down there and the money and stuff given got here from the sponsors, no longer Oprah. particular, she does have a beginning place that helped yet no longer plenty once you be attentive to tens of millions of human beings gave a ton of funds as did the the federal government and it maintains. while Oprah gave each studio member a sparkling motor vehicle? The autos have been donated by making use of the motor vehicle producer. did no longer value Oprah. i be attentive to you're purely a toddler and Oprah for Pres. sounds stable yet we live interior the actual international and that i think of babies could desire to benefit the gritty actuality so they gained't be taken aback out of their denims while they turn 18 and Oprah isn't there for them. yet, that's an excellent question and that i'm happy you asked it. Cheers.
2016-11-11 03:11:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although I do believe Oprah to be intelligent and trustworthy, I dont' know that she has what it takes to be president.
Being president takes a lot more than caring about the people. You have to be able to make the hard decisions. Be willing to be hated, and know that you can't make everybody happy all of the time.
She has to be able to declare war when needed, not just give supplies.
2007-11-11 05:51:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chrissy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I give her a lot of credit for building a superb business empire, but the fact that she has no experience running a government, which is very different from running a business, whereas Giuliani, Huckabee, Romney and Richardson all do have that kind of experience. So no, I would not vote for her.
2007-11-10 22:44:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Robert V 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. She may be able to run a completely successful business empire, but that doesn't mean she's suited for the government.
2007-11-10 23:21:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No-I would vote Ron Paul first over Oprah, even though I really like her.
2007-11-11 01:06:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on her views to run the country, but id still vote Ron Paul over her, but the others she just might get my vote.
2007-11-10 22:59:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Turn off the tv and go out and see the real world please. Entertainers, especially ones who have been stuck in one place for decades and with no qualifications that make them suitable to run a country, have no business running politics. She's popular, thats it.
2007-11-10 22:28:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hans B 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
count me in ( gladly ) .it would be a great change to vote for someone who actually cared about the American people !
2007-11-10 22:40:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by jeffwey m 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Meeee....these other candidates suck monkey balls!
2007-11-10 22:25:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋