English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limousine_liberal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champagne_socialist

2007-11-10 22:06:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

there is really no difference. Liberals want to legislate the lives of everyone, except themselves of course. It amazes me that when a liberal lives in a 9000 sq.Ft. home, it because they are succesful, but when a conservative buys a home of the same fashion, he is greedy, uncaring, hates children,hates the environment,and probably stole the home from the poor soul that was living there.....

2007-11-10 22:16:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Champagne is lovely, and very clever But as Prodigal Son has said, a lady does not buy the drinks. I'll be happy to chip in a few bottles

2016-04-03 07:16:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They're the same people. They drink champagne in their limos while their driver cruises past the people lined up at unemployment, the people put out of work by their anti-capitalist programs, taxes and regulations.

2007-11-11 04:48:14 · answer #3 · answered by SallyJM 5 · 3 0

I would say that both are cut form the same mold... elitist that are more hungry for power over people than any other real political agenda.... control is the opiate of the elate.

2007-11-10 23:40:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

They're sort of like the environmentalist crusaders who fly around in private jets and produce as much CO2 as a coal mine fire to heat their 10,000 sq foot homes.

2007-11-10 22:19:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

They are one in the same. Take Al Gore and John Edwards for example. Their creedo is "do as I say...not as I do". They both are charlatans who have convinced their acolytes to drink their Kool Aid.

2007-11-10 22:41:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I would say the two have a common bond who fits both bills: Hillary Clinton.

2007-11-10 22:10:35 · answer #7 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 6 0

A raised fist is a gesture of solidarity in struggle. That's all.

Association games make for slippery slopes.

2007-11-11 05:02:37 · answer #8 · answered by 1848 3 · 0 3

They both meet up at the "club" you see... and the laugh at the lower classes as they "stroke" each others ego's....

2007-11-10 22:16:46 · answer #9 · answered by That Guy 5 · 3 0

'Tanning Booth Bolsheviks' or 'Trust Fund Terrorists'.

Both of these are used down my way.

2007-11-10 22:13:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers