naw..i wouldnt do it...
adrian peterson is good but his big bust outs where against crappy defense teams..i would hold on to your guys.
2007-11-10 18:57:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Aaron S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
While Adrian is arguably the best back in the league right now, I would say you're giving up way too much. Peyton is the most consistant QB in the league, aside from Brady, Edwards is a top 5 WR play each week, and Reggie is just starting to hit his stride, though he's a little banged up right now.
2007-11-11 02:57:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Massadonious 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who are your alternatives to Manning and Edwards? That seems like a lot to give up. I wouldn't do it unless you have another stud to step in at either QB or WR.
2007-11-11 02:59:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michael 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not worth it unless your starting QB can keep up with Manning and you've got four receivers in the Top 11.
Let the guy who has Peterson rook somebody else.
2007-11-11 04:34:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it is not worth it. AP could get injured and you are done. I would go with three producers and not bet all my chips on one guy especially with the #2 QB. Don't do it unless you can get Brees or TO or Moss with AP. Unless your a huge Vikings fan don't do it.
2007-11-11 03:30:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brian 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on who else you have to replace edwards and manning. I personally think your giving up too much
2007-11-11 03:00:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by kky1313131313 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
your giving up to much
Even if AP keeps this up all season
Edwards-mannly-bush will make more points for you
2007-11-11 03:19:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tim 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd actually take the deal in a keeper league. Other than that, pass.
2007-11-11 08:49:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Da Pho? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
3 Studs for 1 Stud...
I stick with those 3 studs...
2007-11-11 02:59:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Colstonian 3
·
0⤊
0⤋