Is it ok to kill all these Americans/Iraqs just because of a leader's short sightedness? Will Americans kindly impeach the republican party as a whole? Or is sex scandal worse than intelligence manipulation that lead to Iraq war?
2007-11-10 17:06:01 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bill Clinton was a much better President than George (the Lying) Bush! Give me a President who lies about a sexual liaison over one who lies about intelligence any day!
2007-11-10 17:10:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
1. The Democrats voted for this war too so you must hold them responsible as well. This includes Hillary Clinton and others who are running for president.
2. Clinton was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH and no that is not as serious as war.
3. There may have been some manipulation as far as selling the war to the public but the administration (this one or any other one) does not need public mopinion to go to war.
4.The reason THERE WAS EVEN A QUESTION about WMDs is that Iraq had them and used them previous to the first Gulf War and was supposed to get rid of them as a condition of the ceasefire. This was supposed to be verified by weapons inspectors but Saddam Hussein threw the qweapons inspectors out WHICH LED BILL CLINTON TO BOMB IRAQ BEFORE BUSH EVEN TOOK OFFICE.
5. After Clinton bombed Iraq Saddam still didn't let the inspectors back in. The last time they had been there THE INSPECTORS REPORTED THAT SADDAM STILL HAD SOME WMDS .What ended up happening was that Saddam tried to play cat and mouse not thinking Bush would really invade to enforce the 17 U.N. RESOLUTIONS THAT HE WAS IN VIOLATION OF INCLUDING THE ONE PASSED IN 02 GIVING BUSH PERMISSION TO USE FORCE!!!
Needless to say he was wrong.
NOBODY knew for sure if he had WMDs but the CONSENSUS was that he did although which ones and how many was up for debate.
The real question is whether or not we should support PRE-EMPTIVE WAR. If we don't then this type of thing won't happen again if we do then it might,.
2007-11-10 17:33:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well if you listen to Ann Coulter, Bill Clinton is the worse President ever because of the sex scandal.
2007-11-10 17:40:26 · answer #3 · answered by harry 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I guess it just all depends on whom you ask... for some reason, the Republicans seem to equate the two. I can't explain it...
I personally don't understand why on Earth Cheney has not been impeached. I understand not impeaching Bush during an active war but once it became clear Cheney was the advocate behind the scenes, he should have been removed.
2007-11-10 17:11:23 · answer #4 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
No one has come up with one intentional lie Bush has told.
Therefore, I would have to say Clinton's intentionally putting the country through impeachment proceedings is worse.
Estimates of what that cost our country is upwards of $50m and that money could have been saved had he just owned up to his use of power to gain sex.
2007-11-10 18:54:45 · answer #5 · answered by wider scope 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
without question the will arises to evaluate that the school district to which you went did no longer supply you an sufficient coaching. additionally, , how in the call of God does Richard J. Daley, who died in 1974, need to be credited with the duty of the war in Iraq?
2016-10-02 02:03:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
what is so very amazing is the shortness of the liberal mind. both parties thought Iraq had womds, both parties wanted war. Bush was warned by Clinton that he thought Iraq had womds. what do you want, the entire congress in jail?
2007-11-10 20:16:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Serious.. defending the country and dealing with mass murdering psychopaths is certainly a far more serious situation than screwing around with an intern.
Unfortunately, Clinton refused to do anything serious.. and thousands of Americans died on 9/11, at least partly, due to his apathy.
2007-11-10 17:38:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Americans wont impeach anybody because we are scared trained little bunnies that wont even stand up when their livelyhood is being stripped from them, they would much rather gossip about britney spears than even know anything happening w/ the war, aside from "more of them died than of us". Its pathetic. A sex scandal isnt worse, but it apparently gets better ratings.
2007-11-10 17:10:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Apparently the Republicans don't mind the killing of our troops or faceless Iraqi.. but boy they sure like to get into bed with Bill..
Such a joke!
2007-11-10 17:48:36 · answer #10 · answered by Debra H 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's a matter of lying under oath. Which undermines the entire legal system of the United States if the President is allowed to do it. Particularly if it's something so pathetic as sex with a friggin intern. Why bother lying about it? Yet perjury is perjury. Anyone else would have gotten jailed for it. How difficult is it to tell the truth about your sex life? If it doesn't matter, just be honest. It was just pathetic. I mean, I could understand the reasoning if it was something like murder where you'd have severe consequences. But there wasn't a real reason for it. That's why people are angry.
And your supposition to impeach the republican party? Go for it. Pathetic.
2007-11-10 17:17:38 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋