It increases diversity. If you divide you get a bunch of copies of the original, so if the original had a mutation then it and all of its "offspring" would have it. With mating, there are chances of this covering up. Also, mating brings two good genes together, making a "stronger" individual so then theses good genes get passed on, so the species as a whole gets better. Also there is no truly dividing species. Bacteria can "mate" its weird. Its called conjugation, passing genes from one bacterial cell to another. Finally you ask what are the chances that one species being male and one female, probably about the same as us being able to talk while moneys are in the trees. I am Not saying we are derived from moneys.
2007-11-10 16:26:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Richard 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sex allows for recombination of genetic material and therefore greater diversity. Greater diversity means more opportunities to produce offspring that are going to have selective advantages. Therefore, sex itself has a selective advantage.
With asexual reproduction, you basically make a clone of yourself with no possibility for improvement.
An alternate hypothesis is that sex evolved as a mechanism to counteract deleterious mutations that accumulate during asexual reproductions. If you carry a harmful mutation, asexual reproduction will fix it in the genome permanently, whereas sexual reproduction allows your offspring the chance to obtain other alleles that can mask the deleterious ones. There are other theories as well. But the bottom line is that it evolved relatively early on this planet, probably more than once, and in some cases it's probably been lost from parts of the evolutionary tree.
Exchange of genetic material actually happens in bacteria through conjugation, even though they are technically asexual. One bacterium can make a little membrane extenstion called a sex pilus that can then fuse with another cell. The bacteria can then exchange accessory pieces of DNA called plasmids. Someone got the Nobel prize for discovering this. It's a primitive form of recombination, but it's not sex.
The most primitive forms of sex don't have genders. Protists like plasmodium (causes malaria) have parts of their life cycle that are sexual. There's no male and female, just a bunch of gametes looking for another gamete. Exactly how male and female mating types arose is largely a mystery, and I'm not informed enough about it to speculate.
2007-11-10 16:21:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
If cells were to just divide for multiplication, there would be no variation in the population of that species. Variation within a population is a positive for evolution. When there is variation, the principle of "survival of the fittest" can come into play. By having two cells combine for multiplication, you get half of teh genetic material from each cell and they can combine to make a new, different offspring. With no sex, only division, there would be no variation, therefore, no evolution!
2007-11-10 16:22:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Adam B 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
supply up enjoying around and get an agent; in case you will sell rap lyrics, you want an agent. do exactly it! You knock my socks off (old lady expression) yet i'm telling you you're incredibly much as good as any i've got heard. And definite, I even have listened to rap and all varieties of track. Rap grew on me - and it rather is great relaxing. in case you finally end up famous, come back & say hi on your pals & followers at YAP. I only think of you're dropping some time right here once you should be in a studio or something. What do your pals & family contributors say? i might wager they're telling you a similar. acceptable desires...
2016-09-29 00:10:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
dividing and multiplying = exact same offspring
mating = more diverse offspring
1 example that shows its important to have diversity is
- if a there was a deadly disease that was spreading, and everyone was exactly the same, the whole population would be wiped out. Unlike diversity where everyone is different, some may be resistant, allowing some survivors to reproduce sharing this immunity.
2007-11-10 16:20:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ian 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
By mixing two different sets of genes it decreases the effects of any harmful mutations while increasing the distribution of beneficial ones.
2007-11-10 16:21:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mark S 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You get access to other DNA besides your own. That may provide additional survival skills and may make your progeny dominant in their niche.
So it is worth the effort to have two sexes, courting, mating, and all the energy required to attract that mate because otherwise you could be the end of your genetic line.
2007-11-10 16:19:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rich Z 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because there is much more variation and adaptation - usually when something that asexually reproduces is genetically different from its parents, this is not beneficial.
However, a sexually reproducing population enjoys much more variation with few drawbacks.
2007-11-10 16:20:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
one word
FUN
2007-11-10 16:18:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by greatkid809 4
·
2⤊
3⤋