English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think that government has a right to
decide a family type for us? Why or why not? Do
you think that people should have freedom to
choose their own family styles as long as they do
not hurt others? Why or why not?

Across the world, some governments limit the
number of children a couple can have, many
governments limit the number of spouses a person
can have at one period of time. Some governments
decide the conditions for divorce, while some
governments prohibit marriage between people of
the same sex.

2007-11-10 15:19:54 · 25 answers · asked by Matches75 1 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

25 answers

Depends on what government you mean. The federal government should have no control over anything but up keep of infrastructure.
What you are asking here may well be controlled by local or state government in my opinion. That way if some one didn't like what the state laws were where they were born they can always move to a more suitable state or locality.
Having 50 states, I'm sure each of us could find a agreeable one to our ideas and beliefs.

2007-11-10 15:28:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think the government has any right to control any of those things except the number of children. The type of family and amount of spouses and the sex of that spouse should not be controlled because the U.S. government has no right to push any morals or ethics upon its citizens. Unless an action impedes upon another persons human rights, the government has no right to say that someone can't engage in a certain activity. As for number of children, if there wasn't a global population issue, I'd say the same as above, but as of now the Earth may not be able to handle a much larger population of animals on it. It's projected in the very near future that our population will grow to 10 billion people, what will happens in 50 years? Population could be out of control and we don't control population, people will die from famine because there will be a point where we as humans cannot make enough food for everyone. In nature, when an animal has no natural predators, it's population skyrockets, and that usually is not good for that community. That's why we try to kill certain algeas and plants and fish that invade lakes and kill everything, because if we don't that community will not survive. In the case of humans, our community envelops the whole world and you could imagine what would happen.

2007-11-10 15:30:26 · answer #2 · answered by Alex0424 4 · 0 0

Reason for our ancestors coming here - FREEDOM. Others nations have controlled the questions you ask and to achieve these goals unspeakable things have happened to the people that I will not mention here. However........I do believe that the main language everyone must know and speak is English. Yes we are a melting pot BUT if you wish to speak your language, do so at home. Do not force our companies to "Press 1 for English, blah, blah, el numero dos". Hey, I found a stinking box of cereal in Walmart with a Spanish label - A FAMOUS NAME BRAND!! But I digress.

Keep your own customs, family size, and marry within your own sex if you want. I teeder on the multiple spouse thing. Do not hurt others with your beliefs and keep God in the places he has been all along - the schools(Pledge of Allegance), Christmas songs, wherever he's been taken out of. America is the land of the free. Sure we need some limits but lets be REASONABLE.

As far as how many children? Well families should be relatively smart as to how many to have or how many they can afford to clothe, feed, etc.

2007-11-10 15:43:05 · answer #3 · answered by flame03sad 2 · 0 0

effortless false impression! families on public suggestions have not got extra little ones to get greater welfare tests or extra foodstuff stamps. And to tell you the actuality archives coach the common quantity of people in a relatives individuals receiving foodstuff stamps is two.3 human beings, and if little ones are in the relatives individuals that is basically 3.3. So 3 human beings fairly isn't that many in case you have the two mom and father recent, that makes one million baby. If there's one million discern that maintains to be basically 2 little ones! did you recognize the government limits welfare now too? a individual won't be in a position to be on welfare perpetually, they now minimize the size of time you are going to be on funds suggestions. often from 5-7 years. additionally, you should be working, enrolled at college finished time, or in touch in a application making waiting you for paintings. Sorry I basically had to clean this up. i'm a social worker and that i understand the information and experience others ought to besides. My element it is not any, i don't think government ought to administration the size of a relatives. it is our proper to have our relatives the way we'd like it to be.

2017-01-05 06:17:39 · answer #4 · answered by hostetter 4 · 0 0

some what in some cases yes like if you cant feel them yourself then yes you should have anymore than you cant pay for.... sure in some countries they have no room for more people now that is a good thing to say you can only have two kids but think if your house only has two rooms how many kids should ya have..... or what about the ones that have seven kids no job and dont wont a job they want someone to pay thier bills and buy them food they dont need any kids and it should be that way... and for the marriage thing that is all about the money..... once it was i love you and you just lived in peace then they wanted more info whos whos and what ya do and how ya do it... now thats a problem

2007-11-10 15:49:38 · answer #5 · answered by infoman89032 6 · 0 0

No, I don't think that the government has any "business" setting up quotas for the size of a family. This is simply a ridiculous idea. Government control should not to be involved in family matters.

2007-11-10 15:25:59 · answer #6 · answered by In God We Trust 7 · 1 1

No limits to anything, but if the Goverment is paying for the children Yes limit the no. of children they are to pay for. Pay for a family of 2 after that they are on their own.Limit divorce, not marriage.too many are willing to play house and at the first sign of a problem bail out. pay for counceing. Good and Bad in all depends on how you look at it.

2007-11-10 15:31:30 · answer #7 · answered by skeeter195848 4 · 0 0

When it comes to limiting the number of kids a couple can have because it's very beneficial for the country, it's economy, etc. (like china is doing because of the extreme population they have) i think it's alright. But once it crosses the line of only benefiting the gov. or what the leader wants, not for the benefit of the country then it's wrong. This being gender choosing (china), choosing when to have sex, etc. Balance the rational thinking with emotional

2007-11-10 15:25:24 · answer #8 · answered by adfadf 2 · 1 1

No. Limits on the number of children a couple can have does not work (look at China, there are too many males)

However sometimes I think that if you are on welfare you shouldn't be allowed to have lots of children.

2007-11-10 15:29:28 · answer #9 · answered by weisse 6 · 1 0

hell no America is the land of the free home of the brave.. Government cannot control how many kids we have. They should never have a say in that. If I want two kids or ten kids its up to me to decide not the government. otherwise we would be in a communist government

2007-11-10 15:23:46 · answer #10 · answered by biking for life 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers