She is evil incarnate
2007-11-10
13:18:29
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
Hillary Clinton is the most dangerous politician I have seen in my lifetime. She has a true socialist agenda, where people can "have too much" for their own good. Achievers are penalized in that system in order to give to those who prefer not have, or prefer not to earn rather. Any platform she runs on is in some way trying to buy a vote. It's all about what she can give you if you vote for her. That way of thinking is not good for the country, and I hope Americans do not fall for her tricks. Further, the Bush tax cuts benefit everyone, not only the wealthy. And get real, the wealthy are really the only people in America who pay taxes. I'm talking true income tax, not your medicare and social security which is for your own benefit, I mean actual income tax. The upper 10% of earners pay 90% of the taxes, so why does it offend people if they get a tax cut? They use the extra money to start businesses, create jobs, and grow the economy.
2007-11-10
13:31:57 ·
update #1
Sligoman speaks as a true lefty lib, full of mean spirited nonsense
2007-11-10
15:27:41 ·
update #2
I'm not decieved by her, she is a member of the Clinton crime family, tainted by scandal and if she truly wanted people to know about her "experience" she would have Bill lift the the ban on his advisory records (yes, he listed Hillary as one of his advisors) those records won't be public until 1012 otherwise.
She's an elitist who thinks she can make better choices about healthcare than each individual family can!!!!
2007-11-10 13:32:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sparxfly 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Do you get the republican talking points rammed down your throat by Bush personally or does Cheney just shoot them at your face? The top 10% pay the most income taxes beause they benefit the most from the institutions of government. We have a public school system that generats a massive educated work force for business to hire and the wealthy business owners to benefit from. We have a SEC that insures the wealthy can invest in a fair environment. But mostly the government deals out billions of dollars in contracts every year, from Hilburton, to Bechtel, to Microsoft, to Boeing, to GE, all these companies and hundreds more profit from the federal government tax dollars that the executives themselves are paying. Just because John Q gets 50 dollars in food stamps a 300 dollar unemployment check doesn't mean he is taking advantage of the system, the wealthy figured out how to do that a long time ago. And if the wealthy want to complain about the taxes they are paying, i'm sure John Q would be willing to trade with them anytime.
2007-11-10 16:08:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Andy P 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
As for having the American people deceived, naw Hillary is just doing what she is told. I honestly don't think she even wants the job. She keeps sticking her foot in her mouth so much so that she has sabotaged herself.
To anyone who thinks that woman would vote for Hillary simply because she is a woman, I say...quit insulting woman.
As for as the rest of the lot goes, I can only support a candidate who understands foreign policy and will protect us in years to come.
Thanks for the question.
2007-11-10 15:26:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"Like others in the race for the White House, Hillary Clinton has strong words for Pakistan, but has yet to propose the United States seriously consider limiting its aid to the country. But unlike the other leading Democratic presidential hopefuls, Edwards and Obama, she has accepted tens of thousands of dollars from Pakistan's lobbyists, Cassidy & Associates. Its founder, Gerald Cassidy, long ago maxed out his donations to her."
"... Cassidy will inventively move beyond pushing pieces in the mainstream media, also focusing on blog outreach. In other words, Cassidy will shill and propagandize for one year, and use its contacts in Washington ... "
Read more from the source. (and see 2nd link for how quick Clinton or Cassidy tried to distance themselves from this revelation).
_____________
Just reading the news, another interesting problem cropped up, Clinton's been planting questions in the audience. Is this how she intends to run America? Like the recent "fake" FEMA press conference in California?
"She called on a young woman. "As a young person," said the well-spoken Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff, "I'm worried about the long-term effects of global warming. How does your plan combat climate change?"
"Well, you should be worried," Clinton replied. "You know, I find as I travel around Iowa that it's usually young people that ask me about global warming."
There's a good reason for that, too. The question was a plant, totally rigged in advance, like a late-night infomercial. Just before the public forum a Clinton staffer had chosen the young woman, a student at Grinnell College, and asked her to ask that specific question."
"... The campaign's admission that it planted the question may be another blow to the New York senator's image as a trustworthy politician. ... "
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2007/11/plants.html
http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/111107.jpg
2007-11-10 14:28:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
She's a female presidential candidate thats all there is to it. I bet most women don't even support her views, they just support her because shes a female. And Bush wasn't really a sucker. He handled everything right up to the point of 2003 and the Invasion of Iraq, the Invasion of Iraq did go according to plan, but then the insurgency arose. The War Cabinet must've thought that the Invasion of Iraq would be like the Persian Gulf War or the Invasion of Panama. Both were easy, and no insurgency arose.
2007-11-10 13:24:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by O Smart One 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
sHrillery was guilty of far more of the scandals and crimes committed by the Clintons during and before they slimed their way into the White House. Bill got a lot of attention because he & sHrillery promoted their marriage so heavily while he was in many dozens of affairs and short term dalliances. However, sHrillery was the culprit in "TravelGate"; Vince Foster (removed evidence from his office); White Water was far more her than Bill; stole 900 FBI files of her political enemies; strategized to attack any women who spoke truth about her business partner, Bill; her crimes go on and on.
Bill is one of the best con artists, ever in politics. sHrillery is a minor leaguer in comparison. She can not pull off the lies like Bill can and does; sHrillery does not deceive people, very well. I really don't think she is fooling many people; her demographic does not value freedom, integrity, honesty, etc her fans hate business, freedom, capitalism, conservatives, loves socialism- as long as she supports their common causes, they will over-look all her lies and deceits. They know, they are not fooled. What you consider evil is what she thinks is OK- lying, conning, promoting socialism, etc.
2007-11-10 13:38:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
I'm totally with you. A country that would put her and Slick Willie BACK into the White House would be pathetic.
2007-11-10 15:34:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by itsallgood 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If it comes to Hillary vs Rudy, then Hillary is the better choice. I agree with you that she is a bad choice, but for different reasons than yours. That I would take her over that attention seeker faithless Rudy shows just how bad Rudy is.
2007-11-10 14:41:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
She is the best the Democrats can offer. She is even better than what the Republicans offer. You know nothing about politics or your government. Don't vote and pick other topics
2007-11-10 14:27:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by sligoman 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think that Hillary Clinton is not quite as popular as
the mainstream press says she is .I agree with you .Hillary Clinton is a wicked woman .I will vote for John Edwards .
2007-11-10 13:24:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋