2007-11-10 13:03:42 · 8 answers · asked by SithLord 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Elian was not sent back at gun point. Federal Agents had to use guns in order to extradite him from his distant relatives whom he did not know, in order to give his blood relative, his father, custody. Hating a dictator is not a valid reason to steal a man's son from him. That is one of the few things Janet Reno did right.
2007-11-10 13:14:07 · answer #1 · answered by joker_32605 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
There would be no President Bush because he would have lost Florida, so he could not become president so he could not sent Elion Gonzalez back to Cuba at gunpoint. so he would have won Florida..................
2007-11-10 13:20:15 · answer #2 · answered by meg 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The boy went back to his family in Cuba. Period.
Get over your blind hatred of Clinton, okay?
2007-11-10 13:12:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Why do you care? People like you want them all sent home anyway.
2007-11-10 13:15:48 · answer #4 · answered by Boss H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Engaging in some revisionist history?
2007-11-10 13:08:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Quit holding your breath. Your horns are going to blow off.
2007-11-10 13:17:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Good job.
2007-11-10 13:15:42 · answer #7 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thank you comrade.
2007-11-10 13:05:59 · answer #8 · answered by citizenvnfla 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋