2007-11-10 11:51:11 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
WHAT DO EACH HAVE TO OFFER???
2007-11-10 11:54:12 · answer #1 · answered by p09oil 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Republicans lost my vote forever when they nominated Ronald "Trees" cause pollution" Reagan for President. When he said that he'd get american business moving again, folks failed to heed my warning that he'd get it moving to South America, South Korea and China.
I don't know how anyone can think that the man who made the Environment a Single Party issue and turned the Blue Collar middle class into the Working Poor was a Great President. The current Republican leader is the WORST PRESIDENT EVER and that's already History's judgement, not just mine.
If it comes down to it, I'll hold my nose and vote for Hilly.
But, a Ron Paul\Dennis Kuccinich National Salvation Ticket is starting to look good. Talk about gridlock!
2007-11-10 23:14:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no manner i would vote for both liberal!! Nonetheless for the sake of this question i might need to say i would vote for the supreme liberal Hillary. I'd vote for her given that i would love to peer her in motion when the next huge terrorists attack hits america. She would have got to do what the entire liberals said Bush did improper. Due to the fact Bush was once proper. Any fool would have got to determine that Saddam delivered all his WMD to Syria. There's a booklet out written via an Iraqi normal that states the truth that these WMD went to Syria. If most effective Bush would provide on his promise to break terrorists states like Syria.
2016-08-06 03:38:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it seems to me right now that Rudy is the popular choice. But please, don't discount the moral choice.
No matter what any of think this is an incredible opportunity to explore something new.
Just imagine for a few seconds what it would be like to have a woman as leader of one of the most powerful countries on this planet. Is this something the rest of the countries could tolerate? Is this something the American citizenship could tolerate?
Personally, I would love to see the results.
Either way it turns out it will be interesting.
I like Rudy but don't count Hillary out...
2007-11-10 12:05:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary
2007-11-10 11:54:49 · answer #5 · answered by Ladybug II 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hillary
2007-11-10 11:54:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hillary and I know a lot of others who will say the same
2007-11-10 18:32:02 · answer #7 · answered by elliemae2 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rudy is the choice since he presents individual character, and not only a 'can do' but also a 'will do' image. Hillary tends to test the waters before taking a stance - the essence of 'fence sitting' - and as such will delay when action is required.
2007-11-10 12:04:20 · answer #8 · answered by Pluto C. Rat 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Rudy
2007-11-10 12:30:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I choose Ronald Reagan but since he's gone I choose Rudy,if she wins,learn Arabic quick,you will need it.
2007-11-10 17:23:10 · answer #10 · answered by Ronboy 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If it comes down to those two, I would choose Rudy, however, Hillary may not get the nomination as she has too many skeletons in her closet ready to be exploited by her fellow peers.
2007-11-10 11:55:28 · answer #11 · answered by Kevin U 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋