Should electronic voting machines be banned nationwide ?

Question

Many electronic voting machines can hacked ,and an
electronic vote for one candidate could be changed to a
vote for another candidate by a hacker .My source is
openvotingconsortium.org .All voting machines should have
paper trails .

Answer 1

I don't think we need to ban them, only to ensure that they are safe, leave a paper trail, don't leave 'back doors', etc. We do this by having an independent state commission examine the source code. If the vendor says the source code is secret or 'proprietary', we don't use that vendor.

Diebold, for instance, makes millions of automated teller machines that are incredibly safe. I've never heard of one being hacked, numbers being changed in it, etc. And if that ever happened, thousands of banks across the country would be dumping their ATMs and replacing them. Yet this same company doesn't seem to be able to ensure the safety and security of its voting machines. And the PRESIDENT of the company announces publicly that he is going to get GW Bush elected. What's wrong with this picture?

Answer 2

"Many voting machines can be hacked" is patently wrong.

Voting machines are not on any kind of network until they must transmit thier data. Then they use a call-back system where the machines make several calls to verify who and what they are.

Teh data transmission is much like FTP--there are no partial transmissions, the datais received or it isn't and while it might be corupted, and, if someone were physically present on either end, intercetped (it can't be read on the wire), it can't be altered this way.

In the event of a corruption, the machines hang up nad then try again.

The anti-voting machine crowd is taking advantage of the general lack of tech savvy in the general public.

Answer 3

I always thought they should do the ballots like they do with those Scantron tests, have them fill in a bubble for the candidate with a Number 2 pencil, and then the machine could count them quickly, ,it would be quicker, more efficient and you would have a paper trail. I mean it wouldn't be perfect but better than many of the systems that are used today.

Answer 4

"Many balloting machines might nicely be hacked" is patently incorrect. balloting machines are no longer on any form of community till they might desire to transmit thier records. Then they use a decision-lower back device the place the machines make various calls to envision who and what they are. Teh records transmission is very like FTP--there are no longer any partial transmissions, the datais gained or it is not any longer and mutually because it would desire to be corupted, and, if somebody have been bodily present day on the two end, intercetped (it is going to no longer be able to be examine on the cord), it is going to no longer be able to be altered this type. in the form of a corruption, the machines cling up nad then attempt lower back. The anti-balloting device crowd is taking advantage of the conventional loss of tech savvy in the conventional public.

Answer 5

Yes electronic machines to be banned. Because, it can be done the way we think.

Answer 6

Yes. To ensure Democracy for future generations, votes must be recorded on paper.

Answer 7

YES!

There is a nationwide lawsuit being filed right now by some Ron Paul supporters to return to the hand counted paper ballets.

If this lawsuit is successful the primary elections may be postponed until a settlement is reached.
Thank you for the question.
*****************************************************

Answer 8

Show me a computer system that cannot be hacked.

Answer 9

absolutely, as long as it is this easy to corrupt them.

of course by the same standard we should also ban politicians and balloting officials.

Answer 10

Right, so we can count them by hand like in Florida in 2000?