Schadenfreude. –noun satisfaction or pleasure felt at someone else's misfortune.
[Origin: 1890–95; < G, equiv. to Schaden harm + Freude joy]
It's the German national past time. They are the only ones who have a word for it, but now, it's accepted globally because we all do it.
2007-11-10 11:14:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mustardseed 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Germans have a word for it, schadenfreude. It's wrong for serious life matters, like if someone becomes ill, dies, has something bad happen to them or those close to them. It's fine for situations like being happy that a sports team you don't like loses.
2007-11-10 11:01:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by curtisports2 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i thenk its wrong to be outwardlee happee about soemthin that cause soemoen pain..u cent help how u feel, but its mean to rub salt in wound liek that. i cud understand if it wus a troll, or soemoen who hurt them, but petty reasons, is sort of mean spirited ♥
2007-11-10 11:11:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
well, its not good form but if you want to do it all that you'll suffer is a little bad carma. Sometimes it feels good to laugh!
2007-11-10 10:58:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Oyoko 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
what are you a heartless Guttersnipe??
That's mean.
we should rejoice for someone else, because wouldn't you want them to rejoice for you in your joys?
2007-11-10 11:01:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by beanhead1972((14HIM)) 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, because although they may deserve it (which they probably don't since they got best answer) you shouldn't be happy over the sadness of another.
2007-11-10 10:58:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brittney 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
something im sure at one point wed all like to do....but in the end im sure its wrong
2007-11-10 10:58:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by chucklezd 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well everyone has an opinion and not everyone likes everybody so probably not
2007-11-10 11:01:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by ♪JOKER♪ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea
2007-11-10 10:58:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it is wrong and immoral
2007-11-10 10:57:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋