Marlin was ecstatic when he thought he found his son, but the abysmal look in his eyes showed the true story of that poor fish's journey. The horrors of the terrestrial world were just too much for that poor, gimpy Clownfish...
Soop Nazi
2007-11-10 10:40:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by nosoop4u246 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes the found Nemo. He was the same fish but he learned to help people and stuff. It's jus ta cartoon btw
2007-11-10 10:23:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Amie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, they found Nemo. And Nemo was a little different at the end.
2007-11-10 10:19:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no the entire story is a metaphor. in latin "nemo" means "no one", so the title "Finding Nemo" really just means "finding no one".
the guys at disney just wanted to give the children a deeper philosophical outlook on life.
the real story is about the father finding himself.
pretty deep, i know.
lol
2007-11-10 12:14:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by jesse s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i can't talk for the a lot. yet i'm going to element out that once a individual is accused of ANY style of incorrect-doing, there'll consistently be people who've an opinion approximately it. Michael Le Vell would be harmless and, for arguments sake, we could anticipate that he's harmless and all rates are brushed aside, there'll consistently be somebody who thinks he's accountable. there'll consistently be people who think of of this 2d while they think of of him. for that reason on my own, he's completely tainted. He would have carried out many superb issues in the time of his existence and profession, yet he will now be maximum remembered for one unmarried 2d, this one. accountable or harmless his existence is now defined by way of those criminal rates. the sturdy he has or will accomplish will perpetually be marred by way of this incident. while somebody recollects his television performances they'll describe him by means of fact here: "Do you realize that guy who performed Kevin Webster on Coronation highway? That ummm.... Michael Le Vell, the guy who became accused of sexual attack? Hmm, i ask your self in spite of befell to him.
2016-12-16 04:38:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by newcomer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. They found him, but he's the empty shell of a fish.
2007-11-10 10:23:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes its the same fish and maybe his mentality is dif but it is just a pixar movie, not shakespeare
2007-11-10 10:21:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by 15 Steps of Radiohead 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Its still the same fish, he is still a CLOWN FISH!!! lol
CC
2007-11-10 13:46:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chad, M.D. 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes they found him
2007-11-10 10:22:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Steven B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes they found him, but due to his past captivity, he is now called Emo.
2007-11-10 10:19:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ricky 3
·
3⤊
1⤋