I don't even think the string theorist know the answer to that one.
2007-11-10 09:30:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Niki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This fall, Columbia University mathematician Peter Woit has published a critique of string theory (Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory), pointing out that in more than three decades, string theory still has yet to make a single prediction that can be verified in the lab or through the lens of a telescope.
2007-11-10 17:33:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm,
All I can tell you is about the timeline of string theory based on the information I got from the site
Future: The search goes on for the Higgs boson (the only particle predicted by the Standard Model that hasn't been seen yet), for supersymmetric particles predicted by string theory, for proton decay and for magnetic monopoles predicted by Grand Unified Theories, and new kinds of exotic unpredicted particles is ongoing. Perhaps in a few years there will be some more interesting entries for this page. Come back later and see.
2007-11-10 17:31:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by sholiviks2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The old cats are still batting it around in the corner of the quantum Physics lab
2007-11-10 17:30:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ronatnyu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unraveling.
2007-11-10 17:35:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
still a theory
2007-11-10 17:30:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fascinating, confusing as hell, totally unproven.
2007-11-10 17:31:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Keiko 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Recoil [became a factor] and it slipped into elasticity.
///////====
2007-11-10 17:32:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋