The Pope since gwb is evil incarnate!
2007-11-10 09:54:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i have to agree with the first poster.. but I also think Hillary could do well.. everyone is selling her short and making her into the witch of the west.. I think she deserves a chance... if somehow we idiots in this country could vote in Bush the fool .. twice!!! almost anyone can be better.
Going to be a really hard job tho.. they have a lot to overcome.. and a big mess to clean up and they are not going to be liked for it.. so it better be somebody tough that will not give in too easy... Bush has created a quagmire for the next president, no matter what party..so we shall see.
2007-11-10 16:49:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bill Richardson. Intelligent, long record in diplomacy, actually worked to get where he is. As for making "everything better," that will be a painstaking task for whomever is elected president in 2008 given the incredible damage Bush has wrought.
2007-11-10 16:56:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Taiwan90851 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul
2007-11-10 16:35:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
From which Party? I think Duncan Hunter is opposite from President Bush because he will close the border and crack down on unfair trade.
2007-11-10 16:36:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by BAKER 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence unlike Mr. Bush.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-10 16:34:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul because he knows the constitution and has read the 9/11 commission report.
2007-11-10 16:36:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
John Edwards.. not only is he honest and holds himself accountable for his mistakes, but he also is strong and more independent than the other candidates. I think we need someone who can better stand on middle ground, and he has the experience we are looking for.
2007-11-10 16:39:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
duncan hunter is complete opposite of bush
hunter > bush
2007-11-10 17:19:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by confused 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
None, actually.
They are mostly the same, except the Democrats want a Socialist/Communist Nation.
Democrats still believe that the Soviet Union had the right idea, they just weren't tough enough against the people to be successful.
2007-11-10 16:43:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by dinamuk 4
·
1⤊
3⤋