I don't think so. Bush supporters don't care if the damage is undone. All they're concerned with is that some kind of case can be made for achieving....something. And they don't even care that anything is achieved, but they do want to save face. They want something to point to; something they can look at and say, "There! We did that! The deaths, injuries, expense, loss of international cooperation/respect are justified!"
2007-11-10 08:30:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
"victory" for Bush supporters equates to accomplishing the goals of Bush and his advisors.
An Iraq that is like the Palestinian Democracy where the will of the people is to be done. Since the majority of the voters there want another group of people (Jews in the case of Palestine) killed, then democracy in Palestine means massacring Israelis. Similarly, a true democracy in Iraq, where most of the people want certain other people killed, means a brutal civil war there.
But that's not what Bush & his advisors want ... they have a fantasy about how people in a Democracy behave, that is colored by experience with Democracies where the hatred is not so obvious to them.
I mean here we have a history of hating people because of their sexual preferences, color of skin, religion etc. but almost never have the majority of the people being haters, so we don't really have the experience of what it does in a democracy when most all the people are hate mongers.
The damage in Iraq has been a team effort. You cannot blame the Bush family for the whole thing.
There was this guy called Saddam ... how did he get to power in the first place? Did the CIA help him get there? What President approved that?
Then there was the whole mess leading up to the Iran Iraq war. Remember that the government of Iran is the direct result of the USA and Britain doing Regime Change there. So the US secretly gave aid to the Iran Iraq war to perpetuate the killing, and the whole thing was funded by Kuwait, which ultimately led to trouble for Kuwait.
There is a big mess over there, and there have been a whole string of administrations & congresses contributing to making it worse. Don't lay it all on one person like the current leadership, Saddam, or bin Laden.
2007-11-10 08:34:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Whether or not you're smart enough to realize it, the United States invaded Iraq. The Democrats went right along with the plan.
That fact that the Chicago Public School System produces some of the most uneducated people on the planet becomes painfully more obvious with each passing day. It contributes to the overall observation that you are an ignorant phuck.
Air Force vet my rump. You're too stupid to qualify for military service. They don't take category V under any circumstance.
2007-11-10 08:39:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Return of Bite My Shiny Metal... 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
As an American (which i'm no longer particular you're, because you do not look to have command of the English Language), i do not supply a flying turn what something of the globe thinks about u . s .. Frankly, the United State's generosity of overseas help, and the blood spilled helping guard the freedom of others far outweighs any lack of 'appreciate' some wimpy Europeans and different jealous international places ought to have for us. if you're an American, flow again to college and the thanks to punctuate. Otherise, stop demanding about what all of us else thinks human beings like you're contained in the seventh grade and an total wuss!
2016-10-24 00:04:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Victory for these puppets means whatever the White House tells them it means. They are incapable of forming a coherent thought of their own accord. They are only able to spew sound bites and Bush talking points. Look how many foolishly advocate war with Iran.
2007-11-10 08:35:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Are you refering to the damage of removing a barbarious dictator and his two derelict sons from power, causing Al Queda to fight a losing battle in the middle east, establishing a government that is accountable to the people, and giving us a closer base to deal with Iran?
2007-11-10 08:37:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No.
I recall many people being responsible for what is going on in Iraq.
Iran is next.
2007-11-10 08:31:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Saddam was NO nice guy, but in every measurable way Iraq is much worse today than before Dumbya started the Big Lie Iraqi Crusade.
2007-11-10 08:30:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
No.
Your obsession with Bush leaves you sounding like a broken record.
Victory will be achieved when all Islamic Fascists are "D.R.T."
Dead Right There.
2007-11-10 08:43:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Neal 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
No, I don't think installing a new dictator exactly as brutal and confrontational as Saddam is quite what they have in mind.
2007-11-12 05:31:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
0⤋