Myself:
- Libertarian
- Ron Paul
-I read the constitution.
2007-11-10
08:03:52
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Elutherian
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
to 2nd Guy:
Why not support Ron Paul, he really isn't scum. heres a link to learn more.
www.ronpaul2008.com
I think, being a libertarian as well, you will like him.
2007-11-10
08:13:03 ·
update #1
If you don't think the person you disagree with is wrong then how do you have an opinion at all?
2007-11-10
08:16:47 ·
update #2
Populist/libertarian/green?
thats one heck of a blend you've got there.
2007-11-10
08:18:07 ·
update #3
Mike:
Explain.
2007-11-10
08:18:33 ·
update #4
Key word promote. and we already formed the union about 250 years ago.
2007-11-10
08:21:32 ·
update #5
If hillary understands the constitution then how come she could'nt understand the 2nd ammendment.
2007-11-10
08:23:50 ·
update #6
i see you're point.
by the way I don't think you're a traitor, but I do think you are wrong. sorry.
2007-11-10
08:25:12 ·
update #7
I guess it will mean killing and invasion of privacy in the next century then.
Glad to know human rights and government right change with time.
2007-11-10
08:31:45 ·
update #8
Moderate Libertarian
No one.
They're all scum.
There should be a 'none of the above' choice in every election, and anythime 'none of the above' wins, everyone else running should banned from politics for life, and a new election held.
2007-11-10 08:10:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
- Anarchist, libertarian socialist to left-libertarian.
- People who don't invade their neighbors, and who try to help people, without running other people's lives. I don't support politicians or parties. I support most labor unions, particularly when they avoid the NLRB system, and support every kind of mutual aid.
- The state can't limit itself, and the state is more open to influence from the most powerful than from the rest. So alternatives are needed, preferably anarchism, but also other forms of panarchism or polyarchy. This doesn't mean chaos: "Liberty - Mother, not daughter, of Order," as Tucker paraphrased Proudhon.
- The vast majority of the property claims which the state recognizes are ones which each classical liberal, or libertarian, theory condemns: the claims of the feudal landlord against the peasants, or the plantation owner against the slaves, the claims of the subsidized robber-baron against the workers, the claims of the monopolist against his/her competitors, and the perpetuation thereof.
- But we cannot simply right the plainer wrongs, because we cannot agree on one system. Among others, the anarchocommunists, Proudhon, Locke, and the right-libertarians describe a succession of views, ranging from possession, through different degrees of stickiness (continuing possession and constructive abandonment) to property. The physiocrats, geoists, et al. challenge all of these. We have to accept, if not embrace, ambiguity, and local standards.
- Ideally, it should hardly matter who owns how much today; people should be secure in their possessions, and the poorest should have the same chance to improve his/her life as the richest.
2007-11-10 12:54:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by MarjaU 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
a blend of conservative and liberal democrats the purely reason i appreciate the conservative is they centred on economic progression. economic progression is necessary because it makes a rustic extra greater and mightier through having extra source we may be able to used that resources to assist human beings in favor construct extra positive colleges and so on and so on. yet they use that money to make the wealthy get richer and they have a sturdy attractiveness of exploiting the negative. That what they did contained in the 80s at the same time as Margaret Thatcher changed into in capacity contained in the united kingdom. I absolutely have my own political evaluations.
2016-10-24 00:01:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm something like a populist/libertarian/green and I completely support RON PAUL. He's the first good one to have a chance EVER. Excluding Jefferson.
Ron Paul votes as an extension of the constitution and that suits me better than people imposing their opinions on everyone else. Ron Paul wants to remove agencies that inhibit the constitution such as the Federal Reserve.
Please research monitary policy
RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT
2007-11-10 08:16:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Moderate to Liberal Democrat.
Haven't decided between Clinton or Obama yet.
Because I can think for myself and I don't believe that everyone who doesn't think and feel exactly the same way I do is a bad person, wrong, a traitor, or a total idiot.
If I disagree with someone, I think they have a different opinion than I do which is not necessarily "wrong" but a different way of seeing the situation. Most issues in politics are not black and white. You are entitled to your opinion.
2007-11-10 08:15:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by luckythirteen 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Ron Paul checks the constitution often
that is, of major stock he holds of at least
three gold mining companies. He sure likes
to check the constitution of the federal reserve.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolan_chart
For people who can see no real sense in
these label swindels with libertarian etc, (how can
a racist and sexist theocrat ever be a libertarian?)
I offer an alternative concept of orientation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolan_chart
I am politically liberal, with altruism as main orientation
derived from christian roots, plus a conservative element
- to forward an Earth one can live on, to our all children.
Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel
2007-11-10 08:43:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Todo 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
I would classify myself as an independent and if by spectrum you mean "morality;" quite frankly that is none of your business.
I support Hillary Clinton: because she has been tested; she's experienced on the international stage; and indeed, she epitomizes family values by keeping her marriage together despite an overwhelming, eyes-wide-open scandal.
This country needs more than just change; it needs a new viewpoint. And I believe it is time to see this country through female eyes and the nurturing so commiserate we sincerely hope that brings.
More than anyone currently running, Senator Clinton understands the consitution and the role it plays in government to an extraordinary degree.
2007-11-10 08:22:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ziggy 2
·
2⤊
4⤋
Used to be a religious radical republican.
Today - Moderate or depends on the issue.
Most people using the word conservative are using it in a brainwashed black and white sense and don't understand its broadness. Google it.
The dictionary definition of conservative is keeping the status quo. Conservative governments are usually militant and limit the rights of its citizens. Liberal governments try to treat all people equally. Progressive wants improvement.
Many people are fiscal conservatives and only care about money. I want balanced budgets and to limit waste.
Republican and conservative are not the same.
However, republicans are for privatizing public utilities, so that a minority of rich people can profit off of the publicly built facilities.
With 12 years of a Republican held congress, why are so many able people on welfare? Time to keep jobs in the US and put even prisoners to work for their room and board. Free Trade is slave labor for a few rich people's profit and Bush greatly expanded this. Time to bring back family values - mom and pop shops, family farms, and patriotically made in the USA products.
I'm conservative as in keeping my eyes, ears, and feet on earth and want to conserve the real world rather than covering earth with artificial concrete and metal.
I'm liberal as in the Statue of Liberty and the constitution's "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness." I'm liberal in the sense of a Democratic Republic were the people are in control rather than a king or a minority of wealthy.
I'm against racism toward Native Americans. The word "illegal aliens" is pure racism. A more accurate term is Native Americans without US Visas. Spaniards, Latinos, and Hispanics are white Europeans. The reason there are not more Native Americans in this country is because our European ancestors were like the Nazi's and in their genocide war killed more Native American people than Hitler killed Jews.
I'm conservative in keeping women's rights to safe and quality hospital care and am against government regulating women's private bodies.
I'm conservative in keeping government and religion separate. I'm conservative as in keeping the first amendment of freedom of speech and religion.
However, I'm against religious brainwashing, such as preachers giving sermons on how the opposing party (demo) is Hitler and to vote solely to limit women's rights. And then only allowing the audience to say "Amen," Hallelujah," and "That's Right Brother."
2007-11-10 08:17:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mike 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Definately Ron Paul. He has been right almost all the time and says what he believes, not wht is expected or the poles show is popular
2007-11-10 08:08:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Liberal
Obama
The government's job is, among other things, to form a more perfect union and promote the general welfare. In the 21st century this means universal health care and better public education.
2007-11-10 08:20:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Duffman 5
·
2⤊
5⤋