Describe to me a world with 100% women vs. a world with 100% men?

Question

Please be sensitive about it.

I mean it in terms of how society would be, not reproducing.

Answer 1

We'd all be extinct because nobody would be able to have kids.

If it was possible, I think both societies would be the same, just with different genders.

Answer 2

I honestly think both would be terrible.

100% men

Agressive
fighting
wars

100% women

bitchy
backstabbing
competitive

I formed this opinion from both my own experiences with same sex (all girls) education and my friends experiences with same sex (all boys) education.

Even if there is a flame war going on here, I think it's great the world is more or less 50% men and women.

Answer 3

If the world had only women in it, it would mean that all the men had to go somewhere.

I think the worst women (like Hillary Clinton) would take over and the world would not be much different. In fact, it would perhaps be much worse because there would be no strong men to fight against power hungry elitist monsters like Hillary.

In a world without women, well, it wouldn't last too long. It would not take long for them to all kill each other without the civilizing influence of gentle women.

This is my sincere belief.

Answer 4

Putting aside the extinction that would ensure, I'd have to tell you that current men and women behaviour is shaped by their respective influences. So, I'll try to reply you thinking what would happen if men, or women, disappear altogether, but the current "collective mindset" of men and women is still the same of today.
I think men's society would be both more competitive and more less. With no women around, I think some art displayings, like boybands (created sometimes to capitalize on girl's interests), fashion, part of theatrical performances and a huge part of the current bon ton would go puff. The stress would be pointed on physical, and economical competition, but without the connotation of "getting laid". Due to the current education imparted to men and women, society would be more like a "pack": without families to care about men and boys would gather around the rich and the powerful. Maybe even the nerds, or the geeks, could be someone. They would control technology, and without women no one would notice their lack of social skills. Since there would be not female bodies to exploit, men would be less controlled by sexual exploitation in media and merchandising, but more on the concept of competition. No one will buy the beer, or the car, advertized by the hottest babe, but everyone will buy the "manliest" beer or the most pumped, accessorized car in the market. Since the current mindset of men is leaving children's welfare to women, I think we would have to learn how to care for them, or scholarize them really soon. Since lots of countries are still male-centric, I don't think there would be other changes.
Women are taught to communicate, and currently society push little girls into seeing spoiled blondies without any talent aside their boobs and curves showing their booties to get laid with someone rich and powerful. Without men around, I think such false models would have no need to exist, so women emancipation could have the opportunity to make another step. Some girls will finally discovered they can be able to grow into independent and strong willed women... and be happy doing that. Fashion would lose all hypersexualized connotation with no one to impress. Since women are pushed into parental care, I think that being suddenly without males around would lead to mechanism able to combine the care for the little girls with the career of the grown-ups. Society would lose the physical competition part, for a while, but keep the mental aspect of competition. More than a pack, I think at an all-women society as a group, in which the most important women gets the last, but the decisive, word. I don't think it would be a more peaceful world: in politics, even now, women can be as ruthless as the males. However, they could discover as in many countries women oppression is unfair, growing their societies.

Answer 5

BORING!

Could someone explain how:

100% women
-Still think that the world is flat?
-Still living in the stone age EQUALS I have nothing against women.

Answer 6

I'm a man, but I think the world would probably be better off if women would solely occupy the world. There would be a lot less war and therefor less suffering in the world if women would be by themselves, however technological advancement would probably be less fast as in a men's world. But that is not necessarily bad.

Answer 7

Well, there wouldn't be another generation, but aside from that. I think there would be less violence with women, probably more talking.

With men, I think it might be more hostile, war-like and competitive. There would be even less acknowledgement of feelings.

Answer 8

The human race would end because they wouldn`t be having any children.

Answer 9

100% men:
-wars
-crime rate goes up
-prostitution is legal
-no gun control
-ESPN in every cable channel

100% women:
-peace
-unity
-better healthcare
-no more anorexia
-crime rate down to 2%
-no more rape or domestic violence

Answer 10

More conflict than there already is if you are referring to two different worlds in opposition to each other.