no more so than bush should take lib viewpoints into consideration - not at all.
2007-11-10 06:15:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
I don't take anyone's feelings into considerations anymore. I am a lifelong Dem and I don't trust Hillary or most other Dems. I think we are weak and we dont' stand our ground , even when we know we are right, like with the war. I think we need a totally new political system with many parties to do away with special interests. At this point in time....dems and reps are all a joke. Its scary, the only person talking with any sense is Ron Paul and the only Dem I have any faith in anymore is John Edwards, hell, i think the crazy guy Gravel from alaska is probably better than the rest, but i will be stuck voting for Hillary probably because she is better than the reps, however, like always, its voting for the best of the worst.
2007-11-10 07:06:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
America should take a good look at all the candidates and vote for who they best believe in. They should not sell themselves out to media's top three for each party, simply because they are in the top three.
I don't think the Republicans' feelings toward Hillary have any impact on what's going on in the polls. Many a Democrat and Independent don't care for her either, and it's not because they're siding with Republicans.
2007-11-10 06:21:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lily Iris 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes and America will. Republicans are free to vote on any criteria they choose including their feelings, that's all the consideration they deserve. Now is it a good idea? Of course not. You already pointed out their proved poor judgment but there's more.
Politics should be about idea's solutions, choices not irrational feelings and emotions. The worst political systems in History have started when emotion got the upper hand.
2007-11-10 06:29:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why take my feelings into consideration?? Just look at her record!!! That should be enough to make any democrat question her ability to run this country. After all, it is a FACT that she has NEVER run a state, city, business or anything like that. There have been NO legislation passed in congress since she has been a senator that she had any part in writing. She has done nothing to warrant one thinking she would be a good leader for the USA.
2007-11-10 06:28:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Johnny Conservative 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why ask a question and then tell us what you want the answer to be? Just wondering, that seems dumb to me. It shows you really don't want any answers, you just want to spout your opinion...
Anyways. I think America should consider EVERYBODY'S feelings towards Hillary. There are valid points from the Democrat and the Republicans as to why she would be a very bad choice.
2007-11-10 06:22:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by smellyfoot ™ 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, to me the most important issue of voting is what the candidate will do for you and you alone. If everyone voted that way instead of what might happen or could happen to someone else, we would vote honestly as a country about where we are in happiness, income, and personal issues.
2007-11-10 06:17:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by rance42 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Americans need to truly spend the time and do the research. It is the fast food gobble, no digest , type reality TV mentality that scares me most. Mrs. Clinton is obvious. And that sadly plays much to her advantage. Both sides of the aisle. Personally I start bi-partisan myself as the candidates come out the gate. Obama looked good, then a disappointment. I still, however, stick to my ABC's. Thanks kiddo.
2007-11-10 06:18:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think when you are talking about the president everyones' feelings should be taken into consideration. If you don't take republicans feelings into consideration, then this wouldn't really be a democracy would it?
2007-11-10 06:17:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Richard 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Hillary had the ability to save the planet, and actually did so, the Republicans and Conservatives would still hate her. She is a woman and a Clinton. That is all that matters to them.
2007-11-10 07:37:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Good point. Republicans seem to have been badly fooled by Bush not once but twice and you know what they say about that. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
This time it's Giuliani who is just another Bush and probably worse if it can be worse.
Look at all the cronies Giuliani surrounds himself with now. We need a President who taps appointees out of merit and not because they are buddies. Thats just more Bushism. And no I'm not about to listen to their badly misinformed opinions and they need to quit letting the corporate media tell them who to vote for.
2007-11-10 06:31:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
1⤊
2⤋