it woul shed light on the Monica Lewinski involvment?
Everyone thinks it would be some other communication..
but what if the communicae shows Hilary Actually was aware of Clintons affairs...now wouldnt that paint a terrible picture of her for allowing it to continue
2007-11-10 05:48:27 · 22 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
?
2007-11-10 05:50:22 · answer #1 · answered by pigrabbit 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
This is a non issue. Fact is you have no idea what's in those 2 million documents, not even enough to make an educated guess. You're just hoping that there will be something that will embarrass Clinton. What's hypocritical about it is I don't hear the right calling for full disclosure from any of the other candidates.
This is a more complicated issue than the righties on the radio will tell you. Those papers are the property of the US government and it's up to the national archives to determine what can be released and when. An executive order signed by Bush in 2001 places further restrictions on what they can released. The archives needs to comply with all laws before releasing a single document.
2007-11-10 14:12:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
In answer to the question, Hillary is keeping her White House documents undisclosed probably because there is damaging evidence of her "unethical" activities during her years as First Lady, and after.
Could she be hiding some of the Whitewater facts among other things?
Also, those records are supposed to be available under the Freedom of Information Act.
As a side note to those who say "It's over, forget it" It's NOT over as long as she wants to attain the highest and most powerful office in the world. If she has done things that are unethical or illegal, and is allowed to become President.......
2007-11-10 15:23:18 · answer #3 · answered by Lev8mysoul 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I highly doubt Monica is the big secret they are holding. I think they are more concerned to show her incompentencies in many of the areas she tried to get involved.
2007-11-10 17:10:02 · answer #4 · answered by G-gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares about the Clintons?
2007-11-10 13:51:28 · answer #5 · answered by prophet4000 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The Clinton's are a couple of crooks. A crooks best ally is lack of knowledge and time.
2007-11-10 13:52:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
OH NO! Answer me this! Why are male prostitute Jeff Gannons visits to the white house to visit Bush still classified? Your interested in his sex life cause you have none?
2007-11-10 13:54:36 · answer #7 · answered by McCains InSane 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Do people really still care about this wore out, tired story? Who cares, that was the past...move on!
2007-11-10 13:52:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, it's all a little shady, which is one of the reasons I don't really like Hillary. I'm not saying she wouldn't get things done in Washington, but I'm not voting for her.
2007-11-10 13:51:35 · answer #9 · answered by sapphireleech@sbcglobal.net 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Out of curriosity, does it really matter that much to you? In any case we won't find out until the documents are released.
2007-11-10 13:51:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Something smells fishy here!
2007-11-10 15:29:07 · answer #11 · answered by Dr.NO 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋