Food prepares the fat. Rosie O'Donnell eats it.
2007-11-10 05:11:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not necessarily. Crime is born out of desperation, and the criminal must bear personal responsibility for most of the circumstances that lead up to a crime. The word "prepares" is used so vaguely, or perhaps improperly, however, that I can't even be certain that I'm disagreeing with the right thing.
2007-11-10 05:12:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Criminals don't need anyone to prepare anything . It looks like you're making excuses for them . They can have all the credit for prepairing and committing the crime .
2007-11-10 05:17:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd say this is correct about 80-90% of the time, yeah. Problem is, there are just some people who either don't have the genetic capacity for a conscience (true sociopaths), or they have it but it ends up being *drugged out* of them in the name of creating "quiet kids" for the classroom (honestly, did we have such *severe* school violence before Ritalin and the like became so overused?).
But yeah, barring that worst 10-20 percent, you're right on the money. ^_^ We can either spend a little money *now* and have people *get* meaningful work, good health care and good educations....you know, the kinds of things that keep rational people from becoming desperate and thinking they have to Break The Law to get by.
Or we can spend a LOT more later on prisons, psychiatric wards, riot "control" measures (including tasers), bullets, putting chips in people...
And the bitter truth is....our Rich Men rather like *not sharing* a single penny with the rest of "us peons". Meaning, they'd rather *not* spend one red cent, but if they do, they'll spend it *later* when there are problems--and profit centers--galore to exploit indefinitely. Its an inappropriate application of *debt theory* to social issues basically.
The people who *have* enough money to change the game, refuse to because they get a better *return* on their investment from letting people slip into desperation and misery. Solving problems ahead of time just pays the "debt" off early. Putting them off and letting them *fester* into a crisis lets people *collect "interest"* on the "debt."
Never mind that really, only the Billionaires and One Percenter Drones under them *truly profit* from this. Never mind that everyone else has to put up with their lives and civilization and culture slowly *disintergrating* right before their eyes.
Never mind that *losing New Orleans* wasn't enough to snap people out of this...and that nearly losing *San Diego* wasn't enough....and that losing Miami won't be enough when global warming puts much of Peninsular Florida *underwater*....and that losing New York won't be enough....
Nope. The Companies *love* this new Gilded Age, this new Age of Robber Barons they've created, where nearly *everyone* is overworked, undereducated, drugged out but *not happy*, and eventually *stuck* on welfare when the jobs dry up and/or get *stolen* in yet another outsourcing. And/or bankrupt and an indentured servant when a *single* illness and hospital bill *crushes everything* in court....
Meh. -_- You're right, at least 80-90 percent of the time...and that is the pisser, isn't it? Our *Media*, that CEO-owned Company News that we're stuck with, only sees fit to report on the 10-20 percent where this *isn't so*, and that molds *everyone's* opinion for the worse.
What can you do though, when Problem Solving of a lasting sort just isn't even *thought of* anymore? ^_^ Good Question!
2007-11-10 05:31:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bradley P 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i say politicians / builders / businessmen prepares the crime. and help criminal commit it
2007-11-10 05:15:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by P K 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
the rich people prepare the crime:the rich people commit it just like salman!
2007-11-10 10:03:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think your right on target.
2007-11-10 05:12:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nick Name 6
·
3⤊
0⤋