Did you guys see Dr. Phil talking about Dog Chapman on Larry King Live?

Question

Here's a clip - funny cause everything he says about Dog is exactly how i've been feeling - i don't think he's a racist - nor do i feel the conversation should have EVER been made public - watch & tell me what you think

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2007/11/09/lkl.daily.dr.phil.cnn

Answer 1

CONGRATULATIONS TO DUANE, TIM, LELAND AND THE WHOLE FAMILY. It is about time the Mexico thing is over. It never should of happened in the first place. Mrs. Beth Chapman ~ congratulations to you for staying so strong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I first heard the short version and just now got to hear the long version of this phone conversation between Tucker and Mr. Chapman. I hear a Father disciplining a son (Tucker Chapman) whose girlfriend (Monique Shinnery) was making threats and stirring up problems between the family members prior to this tape recording.

It is extremely obvious Mr. Chapman was correct in his assessment of the whole situation concerning his son Tucker and his girlfriend Monique. While Mr. Chapman is talking to his son ~ the very son ~ who is secretly recording this conversation is lying to his Dad on this tape about his girlfriend Monique's intentions BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT JUST HIS GIRLFRIENDS INTENTIONS ~ OBVIOUSLY!!!

Shame on A&E and Black leaders for getting involved and promoting a rebellious son.

What I don't get is how Tucker is swearing that Monique wouldn't do something like this and accusing everyone involved of lying about Monique trying to do this BUT HE IS SITTING THERE DOING EXACTLY WHAT HIS FATHER AND EVERYONE ELSE felt Monique was trying to do.

My goodness give some credibility to Mr. Chapman for calling a spade a spade.

He obviously should of cut his son out a lot sooner but as most fathers wanted to believe in his children. He just thought it was LOVE that was causing his son to not see clearly when in truth Tucker and Monique are both being troublemakers.

Tucker Chapman and Monique Shinnery need to apologize publicly for getting paid to release a private conversation and ALL the things they did prior to this conversation that was causing problems within this family.

As far as this girlfriend goes (since it is obvious she don't like her boyfriends family) she should do like all the other girlfriends who don't like their in-laws or in her case her boyfriends family ~STAY AWAY FROM THEM.

Answer 2

I felt Dr. Phil was setting Dog up just for ratings during sweeps month. I don't blame Dog for not wanting to go on Phil's show. On LKL he could get his story out. On Phil, it would the standard Phil drama, including the mother of the girl Dog's son is involved with. Due to the fact Dog feels the girl is trash (and who among us doesn;t have a family member attraced to trash), the apple probably does't fall far from the tree. Makes for good, tv during sweeps month!

Answer 3

I do think of Mr. Chapman ought to have looked on Dr. Phil, if in basic terms to cement his conviction to repair his language and leave no door open for those to question his sincerity. undergo in techniques this guy is in the common public eye, needs his teach back, not in basic terms for himself however the different working contributors of his Bounty Hunter family contributors. particular, he did not ought to bypass, even nonetheless it might have long gone an prolonged way along with his critics if he confronted his detractors and not only a greater impartial and benign Larry King. Having suggested this, dogs ought to get his teach reinstated. honestly everyone merits a 2d danger; this develop right into a private communication offered to the utmost bidder and that i'm confident dogs isn't any racist, yet i think a manufactured from the inflammatory language used in the penitentiary gadget. Foul expletives can develop right into a bad habit - only look on the "F" bombs dropped everywhere right this moment. little doubt dogs develop into livid throughout the time of that communication -i've got seen his temper on the BH - and those undesirable words flew out. what number countless inner maximum conversations, if made public, might convey down different celebs, i ask your self?? even nonetheless it form of feels to me, cancelling his teach isn't a favorable flow in mild of the justice and good artwork he provides. dogs introduced the repercussions of this grotesque and completely unacceptable term to the vanguard -i think he discovered a lesson and permit's flow on and permit him capture greater criminals.

Answer 4

The Dog has a lot of baggage in his past, but he's done more than his share of good things too.
Like a lot of people, he can say things in private that he would never say in public. It's bad even in private, but making it public is just wrong. Dog used some bad language in the heat of a family argument, and his son coldly tried to destroy him afterward.

Answer 5

Yes I saw part of it.

I agree that what is said within a family is private, but when you become a celebrity, I think you lose your degree of privacy. The more popular you get, the less privacy you get.

What gets me is Dog's oldest son did the same thing to him years ago, you would think Dog would have learned the first time.

With the criminal record of Dog and his sons, I don't have too much pity for them.

I think Dog is sorry he got caught, that's all.

Answer 6

I agree totally with Dr. Phil. I am not a fan of Dog`s or his program and I don`t agree with anyone using that word but he shouldn`t lose his show because of it. I have had some arguments with my children and I certainly wouldn`t want them publicized!

Answer 7

just because he was raised in a ghetto, does not give him a free pass.