Since the GOP frontrunners are actually liberals, and Fox is excluding Paul, is there hope for the Rep party?

Question

They wouldn't want a REAL conservative who was good friends with Reagan
and stands for everything Conservatism is based on,
now would they?

Fox censorship PROVES there is a media blackout and they would like to put up phony Mitt or liberal police state Rudy who have no chance in hell in order to secure the Bush/Clinton Dynasty.

Meep: The internet is a TRUE representation of the people,

those with the money for internet access and a cell phone anyway,

Do you know why those phony polls come out so low?

Because HE'S NOT EVEN LISTED ON THEIR OPTIONS,
THEY HAVE BEEN CAUGHT DOING THIS TIME AND TIME AGAIN!

That small percentage are people who name him anyway, write ins, none of the above!

They are seeking to exclude him from the Dec 11th
debates,

get up to snuff.

Answer 1

No, there is no hope. By the way, Regan was far from a Conservative. He preached against "big" Government, all the while signing legislation which spurred "big Governments" growth and power.

Answer 2

What we are looking at is a fundamental change in the republican party. Gone are the days when religious concederations are the most important factor that determines republican votes in the primary. In many respects republicans have adopted the pragmatic politics of the left.(no matter the disagreements we have with our own they are always better than what the other guys offer). This shift is comparable to the shift the Democrat party had in the late 1960's Before that time Democrates supported an aggressive policy against communist expansion, they supported the working class, were pro family, and anti-gun control. Just look at them now. So as you can see things change. FOX cannot censor the news. On any given day about 3 million people watch FOX news. At the same time ABC and NBC have about 10 million apiece tuning in, and even the laughable product provided by CBS has an audience of some 7million. Add to those numbers the consumers of PBS, the readers of the NY Times and other major dailies, most of which are solidly slanting left, and are certainly not going to carry water for either Mitt or Rudy, and your Claim that FOX can somehow bottle up information is laughable.

Answer 3

Mr. Bush ran as a conservative, a compassionate conservative. He wore out the title's welcome, with the war he lied about, with the massive crushing suffocating debt and dollar devaluation, with torturing people and abolishing the 4th Amendment and Habeas Corpus and generally flushing the Constitution down the toilet. So you see why the label "conservative" is unpopular these days.

What is it you want? The government has already stopped spending money in any productive, useful, profitable areas. All it does now is build even more prisons and start more wars and give your tax money to private contractors. Isn't that enough for you?

Answer 4

get a clue the people of the US do not want a republican in the white house in 2008 the polls back this up quite well so it really does not matter who gets it from the GOP the bush war is the straw that will break the GOP's hopes of the presidency again

Answer 5

Honey, you would do better to worry about the democrat front runners who are communist/socialist.

Paul is a kook and doesn't stand a chance in hell of being elected. No use wasting air time on him.

Answer 6

Conservatives are in real trouble. There is hope, but not this go-around

Answer 7

Huckabee our guy, although considered a 'second tier' candidate. Paul is in this category as well. I guess once again, we choose between a douche and a giant turd sandwich in 2008.

Answer 8

Paul's poll numbers are 3-5%?

Why would you bother to cover him. He would get more attention if he had stronger base support, which he doesn't.

Answer 9

Ron Paul knows too much. I may need to have a "talk" with him.

Answer 10

Err, how do you figure Fox is censoring anything?