Is Over-Use of the Word "Liberal" Symptomatic of Stupidity?

Question

Yes.

Answer 1

Only when their use indicates they have no clue too the actual meaning of their words.

Liberal is often used as a shorthand for a set of beliefs not actually held by anyone, least of all actual liberals, but is a variant of what the dictatorship in Russia called "Socialist" that was no more socialist than it was democratic as they also claimed.

Actual Liberals are about doing what makes life better for everyone, only regulating activities that injure other people so they don't do that, just as they would hold anyone accountable for their , and likewise making sure that behavior that does not injure actual people is free and available.

Answer 2

possibly because theist is said otherwise to atheist. The atheist makes the ei sound like "e" instead of "a" yet i'm no longer completely constructive that it really is the reason. possibly that is real, as creatrix exhibits, that atheists are for some reason extra positive spellers. If it were it ought to absolutely effect in atheist being spelt incorrectly extra oftentimes as atheists use the note theist really oftentimes at the same time as all of us makes use of the note atheist.

Answer 3

No, it is not. It is imperative to keep uttering the truth about liberalism. Liberalism is not the foundation of this nation. Democratic and republican values are. Liberalism has nothing to do with either of these. Liberalism is anti-democratic, and anti-republican. Liberalism is despotism. The label lends itself to equality, but that is part of its deception. This is the type of deception that causes despotic leaders like Pol Pot of Cambodia to grab power with promises of equality, but in reality masks a nightmare of loss of freedom, absolute control, and eventually murder. Liberalism has no place in America. It never had a place until recently. The liberal movements of any nation always lean towards despotism. The democratic party of old was not liberal, it was democratic (well not really, but it wasn't liberal). This is what liberals don't get. Liberalism is something that has slowly infiltrated the democratic party. Liberalism is destructive, sneaky, dishonest, dangerous and despotic. It should be watched very closely in this country. It is no surprise to me that liberals align themselves with the PLO and other terrorists. At the heart of liberalism is despotism.

Answer 4

It is because it is politically incorrect to use words like Communist and Socialist, in polite American conversation, like there is such a thing, ever since that stupid McCarthy started the McCarthy era.

I can't believe they named a whole era for him. They should change it to a period.

Most of what Americans complain about when they use the word liberal would be better named Socialist or Communist.

Answer 5

Yes,all Democrats are not liberal and all Republicans are not neo cons.

Answer 6

No more so than the chronic over use of the term "neo-con" is symptomatic of stupidity.

What really cracks me up is that most of the people who throw "neo-con" around don't even know what it means - so be careful pointing fingers.

Answer 7

Over-use of any word is the symptom of a limited vocabulary, and generalizations about people (liberal or conservative, or based on religion, gender, race, etc...) shows stupidity in my opinion.

Answer 8

no, its symptomatic of the urgent need to educate liberrals to vote conservative this election and rid ourselves of the Hillary inspired race toward socialism. the use of the word occurs as liberal education needs to be repeated often and in simplistic terms, given the people your attempting to educate.

Answer 9

Actually, no. When yu see the cons saying "liberal this" and "liberal that"endlessly--its more a sympton of their haveig been thoroughly indoctrinated (brainwashed)--usually in one of the cults tha tcall themselves "fundamentalist" (and are't, by the way).

That's not stupidity, as such. soe of these people are actually very intilligent. But intelligence isn't much help when a person has been conditioned not to think.

Answer 10

Yes it is. Especially since the people who use the term more than likely have no clue what it even means.

It's much like the use of terms such as 'Hero' or 'Fascist' or 'Communist' or 'Terrorist'. They've been overused to the point where they no longer have any real meaning.