Just being there and being mayor i guess.Beat's the H--- out of me too.
2007-11-10 01:00:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Larry-Oklahoma 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Giuliani is in a mangment position and there for has to look at the big picture. His position allows him to provide oversight over thousands of moving pieces that were all moving. All the agencies that were running around on that day were reporting information up to him, then he would pass new information down based on the information recieved.
Think of Gernal Einsenhour (Later President), the planner for D-Day. He is looked upon as a hero, yet he didn't fire a single shot on D-Day.
As Mayor, Giuliani needed to be coordinating with all the agencies under his authority as well as reporting information up to the Governor and also request resources to help fight the problem that he did not have directly under his authority.
2007-11-10 01:23:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by B. Wags 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Many people would not have handled the situation as Giuliani did. He was sincere and obviously deeply saddened as was the rest of us. He brought a human quality to the situation instead of a political I'm a robot quality. It made people comfortable listening to his words. Yes he is political but he is also human and goes through situations that normal people go through. Listening to him speak made people feel at ease. Yes he did his job. He was mayor.....what would you rather him have done? He was there when it happened and he delivered himself eloquently and effeciently. People need to know that their officials care about what's next and he expressed that very well. If you can't see that well........just be open minded and look at it from another prospective. Okay, compare Giuliani to Bush. Giuliani had that fatherly comforting quality about him. Bush was just......well I didn't see it.
2007-11-10 01:22:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by lemondrop 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Like all "leaders," Giuliani was coordinating activities. You need to have someone who can look at the "Big Picture" and decide where resources need to be allocated. You need someone to keep people calm and focused on what needs to be done, versus what has happened.
Leaders help bring calm out of chaos. It's an often unappreciated characteristic of a tragedy. Compare Giuliani to someone like Nagin in New Orleans and all the multiple ways he botched that tragedy and you can see the difference.
2007-11-10 01:02:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
In ny opinion i feel all he did was show he cared deeply for his city and his people. He was in the right place at the right times.I'm sure his staff did all the work such as relaying information to love ones and so forth. I don't think he should be elected President for doing his job. People think he did something? I think he played a good role and the people of NY think he did all he could he was sincere. The rest is just politics he didn;t bring anyone back. He showed more human traits at a time of tragedy more than his Political traits , he was attached to 9/11 and that is by order of his job.
2007-11-10 01:05:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by professrbart 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Your son's instructor is right. while i replace into interior the army, while i replace right into a firefighter, while i replace right into a flood fighter for the army, I confronted risky situations as a be counted of ordinary. hundreds of thousands human beings have achieved that. Being killed interior the line of duty is gloomy. Being killed interior the line of duty by way of fact of defective communications and unexpected layout flaws is amazingly unhappy. that doesn't make human beings heroes whether there have been many killed. It will enhance our sorrow yet does not make then element of that distinctive classification of people who should be referred to as heroes. while i replace into referred to as a hero as a ornament replace into pinned on my chest I felt embarrassed and ashamed. I even have seen heroes in action, and that i'm not a hero basically by way of fact I did a volatile pastime. What makes me mad approximately 9 11 isn't calling the lifeless heroes, it makes their families sense proud. What I hate is human beings attempting to learn from the solid will those human beings earned with their lives, and many human beings do it. disgrace on them. Congratulations to the Sunday college instructor prepared to handle a soft subject that some morons are in all likelihood mad at him for by way of fact they could't or won't think of.
2017-01-05 05:24:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by brighi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There would have been a lot of things he did behind the scenes, but I don't know that they would have been considered heroic. Things like ordering closure of tunnels and streets and other procedural things not controlled by the police or fire departments, ordering opening of emergency centers, etc. I don't think anyone has any doubt that this is just a political ploy.
2007-11-10 01:05:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by mommanuke 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
He followed the money trail and did as told by those that are truly in control.
"[D]emocracy will soon degenerate into an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes and no man's life or property or reputation or liberty will be secure, and every one of these will soon mould itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will, and the execrable cruelty of one or a very few."-- John Adams (An Essay on Man's Lust for Power, 29 August 1763)
Make it a great day!
2007-11-10 01:05:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hokiefire 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
hogged the glory, typical political camera moment, hid until the smoke cleared, used 911 as a political stepping stone. Think we are in trouble now? Watch this hack be pres. oh I almost forgot, he shook hands with Bush without drooling or bowing.
2007-11-10 09:36:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by curious115 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
He took charge of his city.
Used a perfect point in time to go up in career.
Genius.
2007-11-10 03:20:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by C93 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing. He was the mayor of New York and has simply taken advantage of that tragedy for his political career.
2007-11-10 00:58:48
·
answer #11
·
answered by johnhdavisjrusa20 3
·
0⤊
2⤋