That way he can go after the terrorist his way. If any American oppose of his plan, he would have the power to have them jail or shot.
2007-11-10 00:26:29 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nice leap to an extreme. Too dramatic for this early in the morning.
2007-11-10 00:31:22 · answer #1 · answered by thor_torkenson 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ultimately a sensible one, thank you Sir for this reliable question. severe severe risk of that, for right here motives: a million) the US is surely bankrupt now with $ 10 Trillion in nationwide Debt and in basic terms $ 4 Trillion available money. 2) the US greenback isn't sponsored by employing gold or any tangible and actual components. 3) the US defense force is the only rationalization for different international locations to believe and purchase the Gov. Bonds. without wars the US greenback would be devalued to close to 0 fee. 4) between the NWO plans is the mass alleviation of the earth inhabitants by employing chemical organic and organic and nuclear conflict AKA WW3. 5) human beings would be saved interior the concentration camps, to steer away from any conflicts which includes protesters and so on. You pass in as a human and come out as a robotic i be responsive to i do no longer like it the two, yet i won't be able to misinform you. yet there's a vogue out, one fairly basic answer, for which the Bravest of the US Pres. gave their lives for. The enemy form one has been pointed out for a protracted time, yet to kill it we would desire to unite. United We Stand. Divided We Fall. Edit : smartybeardo : superb answer and information. My hats off to you Sir. some persons are snoozing, yet some are in coma.
2016-10-16 00:13:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just you would be fine.
Exactly what right has he stripped you of? Last time I checked the President doesn't pass any bills.
2007-11-10 00:37:02 · answer #3 · answered by Bubba 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I, for a long time gave Bush the benefit of the doubt... NO MORE!!!!! WE THE PEOPLE, do not need his ilk running this country. Hillary is a female version of this power hungry, self-serving, lying, back stabbing piece of crap politician.
2007-11-10 00:35:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Excuse me, Bush is not the one who is trying to trump freedom of speech by establishing state-run media and bringing back the "Fairness" Doctrine.
Bush is not the one who is constantly attempting to deny citizens the right to bear arms.
Bush is not the one who is insistant on raising your taxes and denying you the right to reap as much fruits of your labor as possible.
He is not the one who wishes to place the federal government in charge of healthcare.
He is the only one in recent history to stand up to our enemies who wish to make you and your children slaves to Allah (as opposed to Clinton who sat back while Alqueda bombed U.S. embassies, the USS Cole, and planned 9/11.
2007-11-10 00:43:01 · answer #5 · answered by Voice of Liberty 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, i think just prosecuting pelosi for that ridiculous stunt in syria under the logan act would do it for me. great question from a liberal extremist.
2007-11-10 01:33:27 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a terrific idea! Why didn't they think of it sooner?
2007-11-10 00:30:14 · answer #7 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He already does. We don't even need to be called terrorists, only dissenters.
2007-11-10 00:30:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
Stop being ridiculous. He would only do that to people who ask questions like this one.
2007-11-10 00:32:28 · answer #9 · answered by Steve T 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is a joke, right?
2007-11-10 00:36:36 · answer #10 · answered by johnhdavisjrusa20 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋