We read that the McCanns had three distict periods of opportunity to hide their daughters body on the 3rd May.
WINDOW ONE: The hour between 7.30pm and 8.30pm as Kate and Gerry prepared for dinner.
WINDOW TWO: The minutes after 9pm when Gerry left the dinner table. He has said he was the first to check on the group's children during dinner and left the poolside tapas restaurant at 9.05pm, returning 15 minutes later after chatting to a pal.
WINDOW THREE: 10pm, when Kate raises the alarm after leaving the tapas restaurant to check on the children.
Is there a shocking twist to the McCann case, and is there yet further time periods when the McCanns story or version of events just does not add up ?
Source: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2007/11/10/mccanns-put-on-trial-by-tv-89520-20088843/
2007-11-09 22:16:46 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The shocking thing is that if Maddy died before their meal then how on earth could they sit at that table and eat and drink knowing their baby had died. ?
2007-11-10 03:40:10 · answer #1 · answered by little weed 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
So now I know what happened to Cheesy's question. Why on earth was it deleted/reported ? I thought it was a great question.
My answer to Adams question is simpler:
read "BlueLadyBlue R" answer. How much simpler can an answer be ??!
People are NOT saying that the McCanns deliberately ended Madeleine's life, that they MURDERED their kid. That would be a stupid statement to make without proof. What most of us are in fact saying is:
(1) Maddie is possible dead because of her parents neglect.
(2) as "BlueLadyBlue R" correctly says... if this was about a more working class family, the other two kids would have been taken away. That is a FACT --- it needs no proof. Please let's stop nit-picking !!! I don't want the McCans behind bars but I would like to see them admit to their failure. In a way I admire them. A police officer told me once... "You would be surprised with the composure and control that guilty people in criminal cases show !". If I lost my 9-yr boy and in that way I would probably put a bullet in my brain... I would certainly not, calmly walk on the beach bare feet and invite the media come along.
2007-11-11 05:08:24 · answer #2 · answered by RED-CHROME 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely ,inconsistencies with Stories from McCanns &
friends.
It has been said , so many times, things do not add up.
We all know that Liars, find it difficult to correlate truthful events, because they have tendencies to forget, what they
said before.
All these McCann friends, should be re-investigated, by Portugues Police, interrogated together, separately , alone.
McCanns should be recalled to stand trial for Child Neglect,
instead of being able to hide under the umbrella of Mother
England.
2007-11-10 00:51:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Window one: you believe that Gerry returns from tennis, finds Kate has killed Maddie, they cover up any clues, Gerry showers, gets dressed and they go to dinner with no nervousness, etc. Yeah, ok....whatever
WINDOW TWO: Gerry also reportedly sent 14 text message during this time. He also spoke with a man in the hall. Jane Tanner saw a man with a child at this time. So what do you think happened, he did all of the above and then quickly stashed the body somewhere and returned to the table. Completely calm of course. Was Gerry wearing a super man cape at this time?
WINDOW THREE: What did Kate do, flush the child down the toilet?
I've challenged you to tell me what your timeline is and all I got from you antis is reported and my question removed.
You are all a bunch of gossipers with no backbone.
2007-11-10 05:23:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Not convinced about the guy who supposedly "looked in" on Kate and saw Maddy. Why would it take 4 months to remember. Plus there was some doubt at a point in time as to whether she had actually gone for her tea or not at the kids club. I reckon that could give a minimum of another hour and possibly as much as about another five.
2007-11-09 22:25:20 · answer #5 · answered by ukjordie 2 · 14⤊ 2⤋
I don't believe David Payne. It doesn't take 4 months to "remember" that you saw the children being put to bed, so that gives the Mcs even more time to hide Madeleines body.
2007-11-09 23:20:39 · answer #6 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 7⤊ 2⤋
The tapas 7 appear to live in fear that their suspicions of the 7.30-8.30 slot might have occurred yet the whole group is embroiled in something from confessing their suspicions.
2007-11-09 22:37:20 · answer #7 · answered by Two Pints Lager 4 · 7⤊ 2⤋
So there were opportunities. So what?
Without forensic evidence to show where a body might have been hidden it's still not enough.
2007-11-10 00:03:27 · answer #8 · answered by Netty 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Pro mccanns are just a bunch of cretin's, no sensible reply's again from them, what a supprise!
edit; They crept in the crypt crapped and burried maddie and crept out again!
2007-11-09 23:15:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Cheesy asked the same question and it was reported for abuse. That wouldn't of been you Adam, would it?
Tab, thanks for posting the part of Cheesy's post that challenged the antis to tell the story.
2007-11-10 02:53:46 · answer #10 · answered by HarleyRider 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋