English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-09 20:17:15 · 23 answers · asked by insert_ nickname_ here! 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Sorry,...there is an 'e' in George

2007-11-09 20:19:40 · update #1

23 answers

Ahmadinejad looks quicker
in a snaky way. It may take Bush
longer to connect, but when he finally
does, I believe Mahmoud is going down
for the count.

2007-11-09 23:34:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would win, he's got 10 years on Bush, he also is very intelligent - has a PhD and so can better plan his tactics. He grew up as the son of a blacksmith rather than the pampered son of a career criminal so i reckon he has some natural stamina too.

Edit. The Chuck Norris answer above holds some merit, Ahmadinejad would have to practice ignoring the presence of Norris to ensure the win.

2007-11-09 20:27:22 · answer #2 · answered by The Pirate Captain 3 · 1 1

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would loose of course, Muslims won't touch unclean things, and George is in good shape, he'd beat the s__t out of Mahmoud.

2007-11-09 20:26:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Ahmadinejad as George Bush would have to figure out what his fist is!

2007-11-10 04:14:50 · answer #4 · answered by stuartie74 2 · 2 0

it has all been political posturing between bush and ahmadinejad. the unusual factor is hardline conservatives placed ahmadinejad in ability after the bush axis of evil speech. he has no actual ability and the media basically sensationalizes and misinterpets what he says to sell papers. he won't be re-elected and in some unspecified time interior the destiny the US will could talk with,no longer at,iran. interior the period in-between we can in basic terms desire the US or israel would not attack iran,it can be a stupid pass and could reason greater harm than reliable interior the region. look at lebanon,a democracy headed in a great direction,derailed by employing the acts of hezbollah and israel. neither have been harmless.

2016-10-16 00:00:13 · answer #5 · answered by vukcevic 4 · 0 0

Ahmadinejad was a former torturer in the prison system and has the conscience of a hungry wolf. He does not have an ounce of compassion and would not stop hurting or killing even if the person was dead.

2007-11-09 22:37:43 · answer #6 · answered by Sergio 4 · 1 0

If they start fighting, the Yankee will win for sure :)
but before that I'm sure Ahmadinejad will talk so much nonsense that will make Bush tired !!!

2007-11-09 20:54:25 · answer #7 · answered by ՎԱՀԷ 4 · 3 0

Chuck Norris would win; he would just point and say Bang! and Ahmadinejad's heart would explode. Then Bush's head would explode because of the awesomeness of Chuck would be too much for his mind to contain.

2007-11-09 20:24:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It depends would the left leaning congress be holding Georges hands behind his back as they have done in Iraq?
Would the media be telegraphing his punches to Ahmadinejad like they have done for Alquida?

2007-11-09 20:35:03 · answer #9 · answered by ijay808 2 · 1 1

George would have this one. You just don't mess with Texas. And for those of you who don't know, you never, ever, call a Texan a Yankee. Them's fightin' words. Yankees are a step below ferriners which is anybody not from Texas.

2007-11-10 02:46:37 · answer #10 · answered by James L 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers