English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or would he still have become the guy who said, ""Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?"

2007-11-09 17:06:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

LOL. Well at least if it had existed then everyone else wouldn't have learned so much and been able to see he's an idiot.

2007-11-09 17:48:31 · answer #1 · answered by ♫Lala♫ 4 · 0 1

That question is SO lame. GW is a Yale graduate, with an MBA from Harvard. It's easy to record everything someone says for years, and pick out some instances where they misspoke. GW got the No Child Left Behind act passed, with the help of Ted Kennedy, so teachers and schools are accountable. Of course the liberals hate it because:

1) The teachers are unionized, and are in the democrats pocket
2) Liberals hate the idea that the population will actually get educated
3) It forces teacher to teach, instead of keeping kids ignorant and filling their heads full of liberal mush.

2007-11-09 17:24:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Are you suggesting that there is high quality progression in some way or as assumed by utilising many respondents right here, recommend a derogatory unfavourable progression..? yet i could want to work out it honestly merely.. all your hates of your President are stupid.. the two in his international adventures or kin policies like abortion.. Who in this international is working rather for the best of all humanity.. without an awl to grind for his united states.. so he may be eyeing for the gas wealth of the moguls in all patriotism.. which chief of a rustic might desire to replicate the desire of all his human beings in all and sundry of his strikes / policies..? if he had everyday abortion as a coverage the full communities of pious individuals and the humanists could have cursed him for killing existence a criminal offense of nature..! He had no longer executed extra advantageous errors than the super stalwarts of historic previous have already executed in abundance.. there is sweet and undesirable impression to each action and one ought to enable the guy elected to do what he thinks ultimate.. you had deserved him once you had elected him after all.. the bombing of jap cities had created no longer merely loss of existence and suffering however the top of a grimy war and an awakening that could desire to might not extra win a war yet teach suicidal as nicely.. it rather is why there's a lot stress against any possibillity of atomic war.. Mr Bush is giving effectual training to the electorate whilst historic previous gave us training.. you ought to settle on the destiny path and in the experience that your intentions are developed sufficient you will get a great successor or get extra advantageous training from yet another like of the present incumbent,,

2016-10-02 00:35:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

While Texans may not have the best grammer around, it beats out and out lying like " I did not have sex with that woman"...or paranoid far left wing stupidity as in " it's a vast right wing conspiracy " !

In both the latter cases..."better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you the fool, than open it and remove all doubt."

2007-11-09 17:14:08 · answer #4 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 1 0

Most, if not all, government programs just end up becoming red tape infested bureaucratic messes which never provide enough of anything to anyone except to the people who run them.

2007-11-09 17:14:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

George Bush prioritizes is the Iraq War and completely neglected the future of the children.

VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will have the concern for the children.

2007-11-09 17:11:44 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 3

I haven't actually heard that one. It's always best to cite the source of info you got it from. Post a link the actual transcript. That would be cool.

The power of politics comes from substantiation.

2007-11-09 17:22:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

"Born in New Haven, Connecticut on July 6, 1946... Bush attended Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts, where he played baseball, and was the head cheerleader at the all-boys school during his senior year."

Private academy in Massachusettes no less. Guess NCLB wouldn't have helped

2007-11-09 17:11:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I think President Bush is an extremely intelligent, brave, and charismatic person. I won't ever be able to admit he's eloquent, but that's something I'm willing to live with. While I know a lot of people would disagree with me I believe him to be someone with good moral values who is a good example to Americans. I think he accepts so much criticism very gracefully.

2007-11-09 17:10:12 · answer #9 · answered by JJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 2 · 3 4

NO

IS= 3RD PERS SINGULAR, PRESENT, PLURAL / TO BE

ARE= PRESENT INDICATIVE PLURAL OF THE VERB TO BE

IS BECOMES THE PROPER VERB TO BE USED AS IT IS A THIRD PERSON ENTITY WE ARE ASKING THE QUESTION OF, OUR CHILDREN.

2007-11-09 17:31:39 · answer #10 · answered by ahsoasho2u2 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers