English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Have you ever noticed how the other galaxies look like they were ,one by one, progressive experimentations towards our galaxy? The shapes, orbits, planets, and moons seem to get more efficient the closer they get to our galaxy. Its almost like constructing different versions of something until you get it right.

2007-11-09 16:59:57 · 11 answers · asked by ben j 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

11 answers

You are right that it appears that galaxies seem quite different from each other. If you are referring to the Milky Way's near-perfect symmetry as an example of a positive result from an experiment, this can be found in many examples of galaxies.

You will find that galaxies differ not only in shape, but in size, and both these elements and their proximity to other bodies in space determine their shapes. If anything, we might agree that all galaxies were the result of a sort of experiment, but who's to say which galaxy is the resulting final experiment? We would expect the ones identified as the youngest galaxies to tend towards that roll.

2007-11-09 17:11:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First no one has discovered planets in other galaxies. They have only discovered extrasolar planets in our own galaxy. Second what about Andromeda. Andromeda is a spiral galaxy just like the Milky Way. And third the light from those galaxies are hundreds of thousands of years old so we are actually looking into the past of distant galaxies.Fourth are you sure you meant galaxy, or solar system.

2007-11-09 17:14:41 · answer #2 · answered by goasklu 2 · 0 0

I dont think you know what you are talking about. Our galaxy "Milky Way" is only one of the billions and billions of galaxies out in cosmos. We prbably have seen or observed only a fraction of those. How can you say they were progressive experiments ? There are all kinds of shapes and sizes for all the galaxies. Just look at the pictures taken by Hubble. Since we are inside our Galaxy which is about 100,000 light years across we dont even know how it looks like from a distance say about 50,000 light years. So your statement is hoagwash ! Just ask any astronomer, and he will agree with me.

2007-11-09 17:08:59 · answer #3 · answered by h8gwb 3 · 1 0

You know...-the SAME thing's crossed MY mind... Wouldn't it be -ah, "Eye-Opening..."- If we all found out that the Earth were nothing more than a "Terrarium"- kept for the "amusement" of an Alien Species with an I.Q. several million TIMES our own???! We'd be nothing more than someone else's "Ant Farm" ! I bet it'd make our Religious Leaders look at "God..."- in a whole different Way!!! :)

2007-11-09 17:14:11 · answer #4 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0 0

Wo! I never looked at it like that before... So you are saying that the orbital shapes ultimately shapes us? Right?

2007-11-09 17:03:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Kind of like evolution of galaxies, huh? This is interesting...especially considering that time is relative...

2007-11-09 17:02:58 · answer #6 · answered by socalcrazydiamond 2 · 0 0

Yes.

2007-11-09 17:02:12 · answer #7 · answered by Tonya R 3 · 0 0

thats a gr8 observation mabey

2007-11-09 17:02:49 · answer #8 · answered by John G 1 · 0 0

That proves it. It's not the full moon that does it, it's the new moon.

2007-11-09 17:09:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Good one up there.

2007-11-09 17:03:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers