English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why not?

2007-11-09 16:37:55 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

nope unless you like taking handouts from the government but if you pay taxes of any kind and welfare recipients don't your wallet will feel lighter with her in the oval office

2007-11-09 17:15:14 · answer #1 · answered by gus1023 5 · 3 1

No, and I will tell you why:

The motivation to be President should be to serve the country above all. One should be thinking about making the country better via their own philosophy and uplifting people. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, is only in it for her own power. If she deserved to be President, she would simply tell us her true beliefs and sell them as the best thing for America.

Hillary does not tell us her true beliefs. She says something different at every venue. I think this is for more than one reason. First of all she sees the electorate as being dull or even stupid, and thinks we will not notice and will vote for her because we like what she told us at OUR event. If she is in front of soldiers she will say she is for a strong military and victory in Iraq. If she is talking at conference for moveon.org she will say she is for a complete withdrawal as soon as she is President.
The second reason is that most Americans would not want what Hillary truly believes which is Marxism. She has said (but only before Liberal crowds) that she wants to take from the Rich and distribute the wealth as she sees fit (Marxism) and has also said "I have a million ideas for America, but you can't afford them all" and indication of extreme govt expansion and oppressive taxation.

Hillary also is not the nice person she wants people to believe. Those who dealt with her in the white house have said she would often scream at them or berate them. These people include Dick Morris, George Stephanopolus, and DeeDee Miers. Despite the pink dress and pretend sweetness, Hillary is a very angry and power mad individual.

She is continuing the corruption of the Clinton years. In the past months her funding has come into question. Chinese businessman Norman Hsu was found to be collecting money via a few poor families in California which were thought to be funneling money from big money contributors (the Chinese?) into her campaign. Hsu was being sought as a con man in California as well. This is also bolstered by recent HUGE increases in donations from people of very moderate means (most who cannot even be found) in China town.

So it seems that the Clintons have not stopped their dubious and probably illegal campaign finance practices that mostly lead to Communist China.

The last reason (although I could give even more) would be that Hillary is continuing the problematic tradition of Presidential Dynasty-making since Bush 41. We have had Bush, Clinton, Bush, and now Clinton again? And how many of those years were actually any good? I think it is time that the American people have someone that is not named Bush or Clinton. Don't you?

2007-11-10 01:08:03 · answer #2 · answered by Eric K 5 · 4 1

Yes,President Of The Norman Bates Fan Club.

2007-11-10 00:44:15 · answer #3 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 8 3

I think she would make an ordinary President, not a fine or outstanding one. She just gets a bit bogged down and things won't get done that way.

2007-11-10 00:53:59 · answer #4 · answered by raichasays 7 · 2 4

In some other Country, not the US.

2007-11-10 00:56:33 · answer #5 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 3 2

Yes, but I will settle for competent, after 7 years of the very incompetent George W. Bush.

2007-11-10 00:54:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

President? No.

Monarch? No doubt.

2007-11-10 00:44:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

Why does everyone hate Hillary. She would be an amazing president(compared to Bush) It's time for someone other than a rich non-self-made W.A.S.P. to be elected. I think as a country of chauvinists and misogynists we're threatened by a first lady who isn't the perfect Jackie O Barby Doll and who thinks for herself and has power and respect. Those of you who harshly criticize her without actual political criticism and just call her a c*nt or a b*tch are the ones who feel inferior.

2007-11-10 00:48:44 · answer #8 · answered by zxcfghj 2 · 3 8

Ask Vince Foster, any of the White House travel office staff, The Secret Service Presidential detail, and anybody who cherishes freedom... not no, HELL NO !!!!

2007-11-10 00:43:22 · answer #9 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 9 4

Sure,somewhere other then the U.S. though.

2007-11-10 00:42:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

fedest.com, questions and answers