English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Lieberman, no contest. But I would more be voting against Hagel.

2007-11-09 16:59:01 · answer #1 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0 0

Chuck Hagel

2007-11-10 00:32:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

If forced, I would vote for Hagel before Lieberman. Lieberman's never seen a war he didn't like. But, I'd rather be thrown into a caldren of burning lard than vote for either one.

2007-11-10 00:35:34 · answer #3 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 1 0

Hagel, the President's job is being commander of the Military and Hagel was a General.

2007-11-10 00:33:46 · answer #4 · answered by godgunsandgl0ry 3 · 1 0

Chuck Hagel, Joe kissed W butt while stabing the dems in the back

2007-11-10 01:18:54 · answer #5 · answered by jean 7 · 0 0

We need to do away with the office of President! #1-Bush has shown that they have WAY TOO MUCH POWER! #2 Eliminating the presidency would show the rest of the world how sorry we are for Dick&Bush and that we have learned our lesson. I think that if people should have to watch each candidate running for Congress give a speech on there platform and vote that day or lose there drivers license . Then congress would make decisions and vote on bills based on there Districts exspectaions.

2007-11-10 01:02:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hillary "Unitary Executive" Clinton.

Serial monarchy. It's what's for dinner.

2007-11-10 00:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Honestly either would be good. Like them or not they both have courage and conviction.

2007-11-10 00:43:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

id move to canada.......both are greasey weasels

2007-11-10 00:32:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers