Have the Americans (with British ancestry) continued the British Empire but under a new name of America?

Question

When you look at USA presidents they have all been of British decent except one Dutch & Irish. Have the British people kept up the power but now doing through the new world "America?"

President Bush even has royal blood leading him back to the British Royal Family.

Coffee beans: No one asked who leads who. I was just simply asking a question. So shut up you wally.

Answer 1

Yes. America is in effect Britain's bulldog. The only reason why Britain let go of India is because they had gotten the US to sign the National Security Act, making the US Britain's geopolitical proxy, the culmination of over 100 years of careful implementation of British plots in America beginning with banking, moving on through IRS and income tax, back to central banking in the early 1900s, the fake first world war, the fake Great Depression, and then another fake world war. Since then, Britain has been out of the spotlight moving America behind the scenes. Eventually America will be replaced by the North American Union (Canada, the U.S. and Mexico) and America's constitution and currency abolished.

Answer 2

I don't think we would be as diverse as we are if we didn't win because after the war America stood for freedom and that is why many people came (and still come) from other countries because we are a free nation. If we were still British then I don't think as many people would come because we were not a free country. I also think the world would be a whole lot different because we were the first free country which led to other free countries. Who knows we all still might be ruled be kings and queens. The Boston Tea Party was when the colonists were tire of being taxed so they went aboard a ship importing tea from Brittan and threw it overboard

Answer 3

No ,it's got nothing to do with the British Empire. The Americans have their own empire and own agenda.
As for Bush , he is stupid enough to be related to the British Royal Family but then you can probably find a connection if you go back far enough.

Answer 4

I would say No. We share a lot of traits because our ancestors came from England, but we are different because we have formed our own country, a lot like England and with a lot of the same values, but we are still different and separate. England is now our friend and I think it is much better this way.

Answer 5

What is your point? Money is power, the Brittish are the only ones who migrated to the new world who was willing to invest the lives of their ancestors to make an expansion of their empire. And yes, because of their determination, Brittish descendants have remained in power. Basically the same old, white, men who our forefathers called tyrants are still in charge.

Answer 6

you mean something like the Byzantine Empire which inherited the Roman Empire. Perhaps. The American Empire or hegemony is more economic than conquest and glory and driven

Answer 7

You can see by the fact that Britain followed the US into Iraq and not the other way around who is holding the reins. America is certainly not England, and they would probably shoot anyone who suggested that.

Answer 8

No, there is difference between blood lineage and being elected (insert retort from guy about Florida in 2000 or the electoral college).

Answer 9

i think so, because long before the people in those places openly transfer to that two countries.

Answer 10

You have never heard of political correctness or affirmative action I take it. This whole: Whitey is the problem attitude is bogus.