2007-11-09 14:16:22 · 13 answers · asked by Samm 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Remember America was trying so hard not to get involved.
2007-11-09 14:16:56 · update #1
Woodrow Wilson wanted to get involved in WW1, the US congress did not at the time.
As for WW2, I don't think FDR had much to do with Hitler invading Poland and then later France
2007-11-09 14:21:09 · answer #1 · answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't see a connection. Although Wilson lied to the people about keeping us out of WWI, history shows that he did indeed make the right choice in the end. As for Roosevelt, what is he supposed to do after the attack on Pearl Harbor, just sit there and stay neutral? Both presidents (especially Roosevelt) showed outstanding leadership during these conflicts and i think that you are just trying to bash democrats. Democrat bashing is fun, but pick a valid topic. (If you cant think of one on your own go for socialized health care or why Hilary Clinton has horns, that should satisfy your appetite for a while)
2007-11-09 14:26:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And then there is the little matter of Pearl Harbor. If you really think democrats don't want to get involved in this imperialist agenda, why did Clinton also engage in regime change in a couple of countries? Wilson dreamed of a global democracy with the U.S.as its leader.
You have the world at your fingertips and prefer easy propaganda to a search for truth. Your attitude will give them the freedom to wage WWIII and complete their NWO agenda
Their are plenty of people who know and speak the truth. You have access to most of them online. If you have a change of heart and some day prefer truth to the propaganda that presently tickles your ears all you have to do is crank up the search engine and go for a drive.
2007-11-09 14:33:22 · answer #3 · answered by Guardian 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Happy to burst your bubble, but no President ever led us to victory. The President does not lead in war. WW I - We didn't win that war. We only showed up near the end and helped. WW II - We didn't win that war either. The Allies won that war. You want an impressive war? Desert Shield/Storm. And what President actually prevented the end of the Korean War? Think about it. >older and wiser< No they don't. The leaders in war are Generals and Admirals. The President gives a basic order. A good President gives the order then gets out of the way.
2016-04-03 04:52:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Surely you're not suggesting that a Republican president would have allowed the Nazis to overrun Europe, the Soviet Union, North Africa and the Middle East, and kill millions more than they actually did, without doing anything about it? Is that what you're saying?
Both the World Wars started without us, and would have happened with or without our involvement.
We entered those wars because our allies' survival was threatened and we were next in line, and in World War II don't forget we were attacked.
2007-11-09 14:28:03 · answer #5 · answered by stevemdfwtx 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
to blame foreign incidents and the war that followed on the democratic presidents isn't fair, with WWI wilson had to get involved because the germans were torpedoing american ships and killing a number of americans....FDR had to get involved with ww2 cuz hitler and the japanese were out for world domination and they wanted to get to us eventually...
NOW! don't try and compare george w. bush (retard) to these great men (wilson had a genius IQ!) because 9/11 and all that crap...now the right wing would like us to think that these "islamo-facists" are out for world domination, but they aren't they just want us off their land, and the more we stay there and cause the deaths of innocents we create more members and the members kill our troops etc. we just have to leave Iraq and the holy sites in saudi arabia and we have to be stronger against israel and they unfortunate choice of building illegal settlements...
peace for all! :)
2007-11-09 14:29:03 · answer #6 · answered by ginsberg68 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, but I wondered why America split in two under a Democrat and he just sat on his hands and gave the mess to Abe.
2007-11-09 14:26:11 · answer #7 · answered by Slow Poke 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WW2 stared because the way WW1 ended. I guess it was only right for a democrat to clean up the mess a democrat made.
2007-11-09 14:23:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Pearl Harbor played a "small" role in the WW-II entry.
2007-11-09 14:39:53 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As someone said, I don't think the fight against Nazism could be considered partisan.
2007-11-09 15:30:11 · answer #10 · answered by wdx2bb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋