They all have swords.
Please give details, thank you.
2007-11-09 13:28:59 · 15 answers · asked by jiahua448 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Give a discription on how they would win.
2007-11-09 14:06:53 · update #1
Give a discription on how they would win.
2007-11-09 14:06:57 · update #2
Give a discription on how they would win.
2007-11-09 14:06:58 · update #3
sorry, My computer took too long so I pressed the sumit button 3 times.
2007-11-09 14:11:23 · update #4
let them all commit seppuku or hari-kari, because they all have no honor
2007-11-09 13:33:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
McCain learned much as a combat veteran and POW, and knows survival in all situations, and three adversaries would not bother him. Clinton also knows survival in a different sense, 8 years of insider advantage in the oval office. Giuliani knows survival from 9 / 11 experience, and being the Mayor of the toughest city, makes him a top contender. Hussein Obama, the Muslim, should be familiar with decapitation, however, would need to seek advice from his handlers re which end of the sword to use. Final answer: McCain would win.
2007-11-09 22:01:01 · answer #2 · answered by john c 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence as a lawyer and experience as Senator and former First Lady to be a good President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-09 23:54:08 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obama is a wimp.
McCain is an old man.
Giuliani will just talk about 9/11.
The winner is Hillary. She'll stab them all in the back when they least expect it.
2007-11-09 22:33:21 · answer #4 · answered by Philip H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul would win becasue he is worlds best human being. He can leap buildings in a single bound, and can run faster than a bullet train. He has the strength of ten men, and poops diamonds.
Seriously, I am taking Mcain all day long.
2007-11-09 21:45:05 · answer #5 · answered by nac7149 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Giuliani would win in a sword fight! He is slick and fast on his feet, Obama would try to talk them out of fighting. McCain would be detailing the evil of fighting, Clinton would be pointing out how ridiculous Obama's view was.
2007-11-09 21:33:44 · answer #6 · answered by KyLoveChick 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Clinton's out, she's not strong enough.
Obama's out, he's to skinny . . . would weaken easily. He's a long shot though -- height advantage and age thing you know.
For me, it is McCain over Guilliani . . . McCain just seems like he can kick anybody's tush.
. . . . well except Ron Paul --- he'd be smart enough to bring a gun to a sword fight.
2007-11-09 21:45:28 · answer #7 · answered by Lars 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Giuliani. Why? He went to NYU. They are known for their fencing team.
2007-11-09 21:50:24 · answer #8 · answered by bobrekrabold 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obama. Youngest and fittest.
McCain can't raise his arms above his head---limited mobility will cost him.
Guiliani is just too used to having others do his work for him.
Hillary would try and manipulate public opinion against Obama, saying the attack was because she's a woman.
2007-11-09 21:31:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
McCain. The only detail necessary is he was a war hero who also was imprisoned for several years.
2007-11-09 21:33:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not counting any political beliefs and bias. I'd say Guiliani. He looks sort of tough and would probably look downright vicious when angry.
2007-11-09 21:34:22 · answer #11 · answered by Manuel B 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋