English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

BUT

sorry, I have an opinion.

IN ENGLAND i was styupid to believe you were innocent until proven guilty in a court of LAW

Has this changed, did i miss this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IN ENGLAND i was styupid to believe you were innocent until proven guilty in a court of LAW.............

2007-11-09 09:10:55 · 20 answers · asked by Mother and Father of two 2 in News & Events Current Events

The spelling mistakes are to test u all!

2007-11-09 09:11:38 · update #1

I live in Engkland not spain, I do accept the crime was or may be bnot commited in spain. BOT who are we to JUDGE, I want there were you!

Again, I wouold like to strees, I don't absolutely believe the story but were you there!

2007-11-09 09:18:23 · update #2

BUT

sorry, I have an opinion.

IN ENGLAND I was stupid to believe you were innocent until proven guilty in a court of LAW

has this changed, did I miss this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IN ENGLAND I was stupid to believe you were innocent until proven guilty in a court of LAW.............
• 8 minutes ago
• - 1 week left to answer.
Additional Details
7 minutes ago
The spelling mistakes are to test u all!
1 minute ago
I live in England not Spain, I do accept the crime was or may be not committed in Spain. BOT who are we to JUDGE, I want there were you!

Again, I would like to stress, I don't absolutely believe the story but were you there!
Report It


Is this how you would all like to read IT

2007-11-09 09:20:50 · update #3

Sorry Spain or Portugal it still isnt ENGLAND is it

2007-11-09 09:22:25 · update #4

Snauf, Thats my POINT no one know's

2007-11-09 09:35:59 · update #5

GF thanks great point!

2007-11-09 09:50:04 · update #6

20 answers

ur rite ..what ever your own personal thoughts lets not condemn them before we get all the facts.


personally i dont even discuss it because there is so many opinions,accusations and rumour going around im gonna wait till we get the full official facts and evidence of what happened that day and to maddie.
lets face it ...whatever u THINK happened and whichever side your on we dont actually know the full truth yet.
im just hoping for the safe return of maddie right now.


edit: yeah..i was agreeing with you ..my writing just wasnt that clear..sorry...when i said "your"(own personal thoughts).. i was referring to the general public..not you personally...
its a very important point your making..we dont know!

2007-11-09 09:22:54 · answer #1 · answered by snafu 7 · 2 1

The "professional's" don't have the authentic information to remark on. no one, no longer the pro's or the anti's be responsive to what befell to that candy newborn. The "anti's spout vile hearsay, inuendo's, meant leaks, untruths, rumours and basically undeniable gossip. It would desire to be very comforting for the McCann's to be responsive to that all and sundry the anti's be responsive to the certainty till now the the remainder of the international does. Oh, and by employing the way, I do watch television and examine the newpapers yet I actually have a recommendations of my own and could make my own judgements.

2016-10-15 22:46:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

true in England you Innocent till proved guilty as i have said be for we was not there so we dont know what did happen but it upsets people with all the stories flying around so i say keep an opened mind the truth will come out

2007-11-09 09:47:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Anti McCanns ? Me ? Not at all... they are probably very good company at dinner.... over a drink off 14 bottles of wine... however, what motivates me to comment on the case is the desperation (that we all feel)as parents that
(1) someone should have neglected their kids that way;
(2) that the law aimed at protecting children at risk does not seem to apply to all of us ;
(3) if that crime had been commited by you or I, it would quickly result in a lot more than has so far resulted to them.
So this case carries a lot of issues that many of us feel very uncomfortable about. Now if none of those issues bothers you, well, continuing mocking as you have just done.
You see.... I don't see this case as a war between social classes. It shoud be instead something we should all be together wanting to put right through criticism and discussion in this very public of forums... you know... be doctor and always do right whatever you do. Calling those two "upper middle class" does not wash with me or impress me in the slightest. What has really disturbed me in particular in this case is to see people defending them simply because they are "British like us" or because they are members of a social class we would like to be seen part of. That is what bothers me the most.

2007-11-09 09:44:22 · answer #4 · answered by RED-CHROME 6 · 4 4

Wrong. The Keystone Cops of the Met can decide if you are guilty and shoot you without trial, and then call it "protecting the public" and hide the evidence to avoid an embarrassing murder trial.

2007-11-09 09:16:55 · answer #5 · answered by Phil McCracken 5 · 3 4

I was totally styupid to believe that this is the EngKlish language.

2007-11-09 09:25:29 · answer #6 · answered by karriemak 6 · 1 3

shady critisizing someones spelling,
lmfao.

2007-11-09 09:26:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

It wasn't comitted in Spain you ignoramus, it was Portugal.

Is it just me, or does she sound like Jlo after a few?

2007-11-09 09:20:41 · answer #8 · answered by !Lady Stormy! 5 · 9 4

And your entitled to your opinion......

2007-11-09 09:21:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Think you mean in the UK

2007-11-09 09:18:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers