English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Any president could, alone, cause the complete destruction of life as we know it. The president has the authority to use "The Football," which many people refer to as the red button, but its actually a suitcase that links him to NORAD. With it he can launch any and all nuclear weapons in contorl of the United States.

2007-11-09 08:48:49 · answer #1 · answered by baddius 3 · 0 5

Just look at what Clinton did when he pardoned all those criminals in the last hours of his presidency. A presidency that, by the way, taught Americans that it's okay to lie, cheat on your wife, and be bribed by communists.

But, if Bush is so evil and can (as one idiot posted here) push the red button and launch nukes, why hasn't he done it? Why aren't we invading Tibet? I mean all the liberals around here seem to show with their bumper stickers that China is really the one we should be at war with.

2007-11-09 08:54:04 · answer #2 · answered by Trogdor 4 · 3 1

When I see some, I'll let you know. Right now, our President is still cleaning up the messes that Clinton left us with.

2007-11-09 09:05:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Don't let your prejudice and hatred cloud your narrow-minded judgement so much that you hate George W. Bush solely because he is a Republican.

When you get to the root of the truth, that's the only reason people hate him. They say because of the war, but they hated him long before the war. They say they hate him because of the election in 2000, but they hated him before that.

People who hate Bush are narrow minded and refuse to accept anything that doesn't fit their template, wherein they see him as pure evil.

Their hatred of Bush soon leads to them revealing themselves as haters of the U.S., because of their comments on the war, etc.

2007-11-09 08:52:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

So far over 4 trillion dollars and an unnecessary war. That's a lot.

2007-11-09 08:57:07 · answer #5 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 0 4

Well, I don't see any damage, other than from the socialist pigs from the left....thank you, Dumbocraps for aiding and abetting our enemy.

2007-11-09 08:54:06 · answer #6 · answered by george s 2 · 3 2

How much damage did Clinton do? and now the M's's wants her shot at it???

oh! good lord! *shakin' my head*

2007-11-09 08:50:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

We shall see.

I guess great minds DO think alike. wait'll you see my next question. We were both on the same page, apparently.

2007-11-09 08:52:23 · answer #8 · answered by Zinger! 3 · 1 2

Well, if you consider in the years since terrorists attacked us , President Bush
has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled
al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya , Iran , and, North Korea
without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered
300,000 of his own people damage, then I'd say he can do a whole helluva lot more.

2007-11-09 08:48:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 8 7

He's not finished yet you can be sure as shіt comes from your asss of that.

2007-11-09 08:50:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers