After seeing some of the postings in here I really have to wonder. Granted, his going into IRAQ was a bad idea from the word go. Some of you think of him to be someone who can't walk and chew gum at the same time, and in the next breath are blaming him for everything from AIDS to Global warming. You can't try to have it both ways. Either or but not both. Or should we look at your last Co Presidents? Gee, Bill and Hillary(Queen of the Politically Correct). Do either of them know the meaning of the word ethics? I know some of you will label me with the evil, cold hearted, mean spirited, Conservative label. I am only rasing a point, and how do you defend yourselves, name calling, grow up.
2007-11-09 08:19:17 · 14 answers · asked by mntazzy 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Like just about every damn politician....probably a little of both.
2007-11-09 08:23:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
President Bush is a educated man who for some reason can not sell his ideas when he opens his mouth. He would have a hard time selling falsified Stocks to his grandmother.
Remember he is advised on everything he does, and all the information he receives passes though many sources. Still he can not sell it. This President will go down in history as having one of the worse PR staffs in time, along with a very poor speech ability.
Where no one always agrees with every President, many in the past facing very hard times had the skill to rally the public around the cause. Bush does not have this skill. Even when he is making a "good" decision, he sells it badly.
2007-11-09 08:33:06 · answer #2 · answered by Carl P 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well lets see. Oil at almost $100 a barrell. The dollar at all time lows. Trade deficit soring. Most countries in the world hating the US. What gets me is he does nothing about it. What was all that talk about nuclear plants. Converting old bases into nuclear bases. He has no real plan, just empty words.
2007-11-09 08:28:53 · answer #3 · answered by Neil 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I don't think anyone who's a complete & utter MORON could be President. Sure, he's not the most eloquent of speakers and he's doesn't come off as the most brilliant of fellas - but I doubt that he's an idiot. (But it is kinda fun to play up on his foibles and make him the butt of many jokes...)
2007-11-09 08:26:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
He's a moron who happens to be very powerful. The fact that Bush has caused all the problems that he has and fails to address so many others does not contradict the fact that he's not very bright.
You seem to not grasp the fact that power and stupidity are not mutally exclusive terms (the way that "compassionate conservatism" is or like "a Pro-Life death penalty and war supporter" is. Ok, not mutually contradictory, just confused and hypocritical, I guess.)
2007-11-09 08:22:38 · answer #5 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
He is BRAIN DEAD. He isn't smart enough to be considered an idiot, a moron, or an evil genius.
2007-11-09 08:36:41 · answer #6 · answered by GRUMPY 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree completely! Too many hypocrites blaming everyone else for anything they can and love finding a scapegoat to point fingers at.
2007-11-09 08:22:48 · answer #7 · answered by sirdouglas527 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush is the moron.
Cheney's the evil genius.
2007-11-09 08:53:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I vote for Moron
2007-11-09 08:26:26 · answer #9 · answered by L H 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He's the US answer to Mr Bean..but more evil.
2007-11-09 08:25:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋