2007-11-09 07:42:39 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Even if I were needy, she still wouldn't appeal to me.
2007-11-09 07:46:01 · answer #1 · answered by ~*Fender Freak*~ 3 · 8⤊ 5⤋
You will only like Hillary if you are needy or if you would like to pay more in taxes. Remember Hillary is a Socialist. She knows how to spend your money better than you do.
2007-11-09 14:30:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hillary would have no appeal to me no matter what my economic, mental or political circumstance might be. She is not worthy of any vote as far as I am concerned. She is dishonest, unethical, irresponsible, and politically "incorrect" for America. She would damage our Country and the freedoms we are supportive of. She is a socialist and not a leader for a Country that believes in freedom of choice. No appeal whatsoever, but thanks for asking.
2007-11-09 15:51:58 · answer #3 · answered by turkeybrooknj 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hi John, If I were needy, I would have to positively NOT vote for her. I believe, needing and not being able to work are two different things. Truly disabled are helped in this country, and so are disadvantaged kids and the elderly.
However, needing a job is not a problem for a person who sincerely wants to work.
Her Health Care redistribution of the wealth is simple arithmatic, just like FDR's New Deal made everyone poor. Then who would pay for health care?
The rich will get their money out of here if she is elected!
.
.
2007-11-09 08:41:38 · answer #4 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
She does seem to be reaching out, but to the greedy . . .
$5,000 per kid born . . . what a lure . . . attached to a nasty barbed hook!
For those who contemplate this offer, and think it is a great idea; First there is a boom of births, then the bank goes broke, then in order to make sure we all get our 5k, the government passes laws on the number of children you are allowed to have . . .
In a nutshell, we'd be asking for trouble if we take this woman seriously.
She doesn't appeal to me, neither to my need, nor to my greed.
2007-11-11 06:25:56 · answer #5 · answered by Moneta_Lucina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Half of the country would vote for Hillary in a match up against any of the Republicans. I hope that does not mean that half of the country is needy but things could be worse than they seem.
2007-11-09 07:57:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
She was 10 times the candidate then Trump, as far as budget and debt, Clinton's plans were much better than Trumps as far as fiscal responsibility.
2017-01-19 14:52:56 · answer #7 · answered by Annonymous 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am "needy" like many/most Americans ("needy" is all relative) but Hillary still does not appeal to me. I stand on my principles, not what is best for me only/always. Hillary is using and preying upon America`s underprivileged.
2007-11-09 07:53:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
I'm needy. I need to hang on to what I have!
Hillary just doesn't seem to comprehend this,.
2007-11-09 08:57:55 · answer #9 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Lol! I would have phrased it differently...like If you are not WANTING stuff you're capable of working for.......
Hellary has NO appeal whatsoever to me, not even if I was a man desperately in need of "affection".
2007-11-09 11:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think so. She purposely tries to appeal to the have-nots. She does this by promising to give them free stuff that the middle class will be burdened with paying for.
Thank goodness that even all of the needy do not fall for her lies.
I wouldn't vote for Hillary if the other candidate was nothing more than Bush's turd.
2007-11-09 07:47:02 · answer #11 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 7⤊ 6⤋