An hour-long documentary claims there are 3 Key Moments in the case.
▲ "The first key period investigators have identified as important is between 7.30 and 8.30pm on the night Madeleine went missing."
►In this one hour space of time, Gerry comes in from tennis, either kills or finds Maddie dead, decides what to do. Showers and gets dressed and goes off to dinner with friends.
↓ Not likely nor logical
▲"investigators are also interested in what happened in the 10 minutes shortly after 9pm when Mr McCann was away from the table.
The report states Mr McCann claims to have been the last one to see Madeleine when he returned to the apartment to check on his sleeping children.
He left the apartment at 9.10pm and bumped into a television producer he had befriended on the holiday.
At around the same time, friend and fellow diner Jane Tanner, from Exeter, claims she saw a man carrying a child away from the McCann’s apartment.
2007-11-09 07:24:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Portuguese police are investigating an alleged series of 14 text messages sent and received from Mr McCann’s mobile phone at this time."
► So in this 10 minute time frame, Gerry bumps into a friend in the hall and text messages 14 messages. And may be the person seen by Jane Tanner carrying a small child? Come on now! What is he Superman? Jane does not mention a cape.
→ Not likely or logical
▲"third window of opportunity - the few minutes between Mrs McCann leaving the restaurant sometime before 10pm and the moment she raised the alarm that her daughter was missing. "
► We are talking about 30-40 minutes here. What did she do, go back to the apartment, kill Madeleine, find some guy to carry her out and get rid of her? Clean up any clues, then go running back to her friends?
→ Not likely or logical.
Your thoughts?
2007-11-09 07:28:22 · update #1
Shambo - Ok tell me how it went down then.
2007-11-09 07:44:38 · update #2
professor plum with the lead piping in the library
2007-11-09 08:09:00 · answer #1 · answered by Mossy Jan 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
I am not a policeman,a investigating detective ,a witness ,or a forensic scientist.Why don't we let the professionals tell us what did or did not happen when they ready ????Every ones opinion is respected,as a private ,personal view,but no opinions should be forced down any ones throat.I am going to abstain from now on ,even reading comments or questions on this case.hey remember everything we read or hear in the media,anti or pro is not necessarily true.
2007-11-09 10:38:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
at the same time as the media were doing his bidding he changed into chuffed, relationship the clicking with extra & extra outrageous & confusing excuses to justify their movements again in ought to. now the clicking have dug somewhat deeper, sorting out issues about the mccanns & their habit of leaving the little ones to sleep drugged ( ? ) at the same time as they selfishly dine yards away, mr mc needs them to revert to a low-profile! he won't be able to have it both thoughts & it really is form of previous due now to even attempt. i'm one among those outspoken sufficient to call it as i see it. ignore & as madelines father and mother they ought to face the completed pressure of the regulation. yet i'm no longer stupid i favor to cover all angles. i do not hate the mccanns, yet i do hate what they did. they are suffering without any consideration away effect of their lack of excellent judgement & which will stay with them, always. enthusiastic about the favor of a take-away & somewhat elementary experience.
2016-10-23 22:37:28 · answer #3 · answered by weisdorfer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will the illogical obsession with this story never abate?
In what way is this anyone's business but the McCanns?
2007-11-09 08:33:06 · answer #4 · answered by Peter D 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
There were lots of places to park the body "until we can decide what to do....how to hide this accident.....c'mon, we've got to think of something".......!
There were lots of willing British friends who could sort this out for them....people with houses, people with yachts (one that 'disappeared' from its mooring shortly after), etc.
The PJ were sniffing on the right track until they were intimidated off it, (by this loyal contingent of friends, who have been sworn into secrecy until one of them cracks).
2007-11-09 08:35:00 · answer #5 · answered by starling 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Most people know that,you will never convince the people who hate the McCanns,they dont accept logic...ever.
2007-11-09 07:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by Pat R 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Well put. I've been trying to make that point since September 7.
2007-11-09 09:06:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
its all spin and i am not buying it
dress it up all you like but they are official suspects for a very good reason
history can not be rewritten
nice try but they left their children alone and have earned a fortune from her disappearance
its fishy
2007-11-09 08:12:00 · answer #8 · answered by stacey 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
as you so rightly said, not likely nor logical
2007-11-09 08:08:07 · answer #9 · answered by kati 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
an hour long documentory that is pro mc cann
how logical is that ?
2007-11-09 07:52:13 · answer #10 · answered by Karl 7 · 4⤊ 7⤋