Should the Clintons be required to make their archives available before the election?

Answer 1

Yes. I am sure there would be some very interesting and incriminating information in them.

Answer 2

Indeed, numerous Clinton documents have already been
released or will be soon. The U.S. National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA) has stated that it estimates
it will have processed approximately 10,000 pages of
documents by the end of January 2008 in response to
a demand by the organization Judicial Watch for
"First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton's calendar."

Additionally, an August 8 Los Angeles Times article
reported, "A trove of records has been made public
detailing the Clinton White House's attempts to remake
the nation's healthcare system, following a request from
Bill Clinton that those materials be released first."

Answer 3

Since the archives were public information before they became archived, than why not?
When Congress votes on Supreme Ct Jdgs, aren't the archives searched for any prior information that might lead to a dismissal?
What does she know that she doesn't want the public to remember or to know?
Once she is in office, everything is hidden under "Security" just like Bush does

Answer 4

Where were you when W had all his papers while he was Governor of Texas, placed in his Daddy's Presidential Library under lock and key and away from the public prying eyes, when he was running for president
PS I am not going to vote for her, from the first day Bill Clinton was the Dem's candidate, they were under the microscope, what more do you want to know, or are we on another digging for dirt expedition

Answer 5

I would really like to see the Clinton's held to any requirement at all.

It has never happened before.

I just don't want to go through another Clinton regime again.

I think the country has had enough of the Bushes and the Clintons.

I know I have.

Answer 6

Yes...I believe that they will find her stance to be 100% for the war and offering help to Bush. Why else would they be hidden, especially in the context of her having a conversation with Bush about the Iraq War?

Answer 7

From some reports I read is was GW Bush who allowed the concealment of these records. Clinton claims they wanted to reveal but agreed to wait until 2012.

Now as a good detective myself I can only deduct that after the Rose Law Firm documents removed/missing 2yrs/found in Hillary's quarter's. Sandy Berger and the files from before 9-11 removed from the National Archives. Vince Foster's documents removed after his death... and so one. It seems clear that documents and Clinton = MIA. The excuse to blame Bush is also a pattern we have seen over their 30 plus years in politics.

Reminds me of the Whitewater deal they made. After being charged with Perjury & Obstructing Justice WJC agreed to a six year suspension of his ARK law license. If only he agreed to cease the investigation into the Whitewater controversy. Funny, he made out pretty well in my opinion there.

Should/ could / would. Remember who we are dealing with. Personally I wonder also what will be left anyway. Last week the news reported more files including emails between Hill & Bill during her failed healthcare initiative and Monica gate. From their library to offices. to where ever. They are out there and would enlighten the world as to the true colors of these very crafty individuals. Thank you.

Answer 8

No. but mostly who cares.

Also I think Hillary made it clear. They're not HER records to release and even if they got "released" they'd probably only get released at the snails-pace of the presidential archives always move.

Answer 9

It is not up to them,the Clintons don't control what is released

Answer 10

Yes

Answer 11

Since Hillary is claiming her time in the white house is the basis for her qualifications for the Presidency. Yes, show us what you did to make you qualified.