Most republicans win the entire western states, and those people are not happy with Bush at the moment. She could win them, if they are fooled by her promises. Bill Clinton won them by promising a tax cut for the middle class, and ended up giving them the biggest tax increase in history.
2007-11-09 05:11:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steve C 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
You can't imagine Rudy losing NY? I sure can. Back when she first ran for the Senate he saw the polls favored her completely and backed out with an excuse about his cancer, which was already until control. Right now it's speculated that she will indeed win NY state. She'll likely take Ohio as well. The last time I saw an overview of who is ahead in which states, and whether those states were blue or red, she was projected to turn 4 red states blue. Unfortunately, I'm too lazy to look up which states those were, sorry.
2007-11-09 05:44:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh great, the who would screw up this country the worst election. If Rudy gets the nomination it'll be interesting to see how many people vote from him who don't live in the blue states. The Republicans don't seem to have a chance this election. There is no one that anybody really likes. If anybody gets more votes than Dole did they should get a cookie lol.
2007-11-09 07:29:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
conventional vote, in a run-off election like France does if no candidate wins a majority of the favored vote after the 1st election. In a nicely-liked vote election, your vote could quite count number and be equivalent in all fifty one electoral areas. i'm effective the folk of u . s . a . are actually clever sufficient to at as quickly as choose for their president after 2 hundred plus years. Territories ought to be allowed to vote for the President as nicely, they have that ideal in France as nicely, which has a Semi-Presidental device. the assumption of a nicely-liked vote became heavily entertained after an election Nixon gained in 1968. He had .a million% extra conventional vote yet had 301 EVs over 191(Humphrey) and forty six (Wallace, a southern protest vote by utilising the electors). Electoral college protects the rights of the small states and that's the place the modification seen its fall. It exceeded Congress even though it died in the smaller states. So the two each and all the States conform to a pair form of electoral college reform or choose for conventional vote or human beings settle in this count number in a Referendum.
2016-10-01 23:34:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by sutliff 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure, but from what I heard from New Yorkers they would vote for Hillary.
However, I would bet there are polls out there just FOR NY for Hillary vs Rudy.
2007-11-09 06:00:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Juicy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why do you think Hillary wants to give illegals driver licenses. It is a trick to get them to vote. There are not enough dead people or pets voting in NY to swing the election for her.
2007-11-09 08:08:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by heThatDoesNotWantToBeNamed 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
According to most polls, Hillary wins NY. She mostly likely will keep all Blue states and steal one or 2 Reds to win the whole thing. Bush has really screwed the Republican party.
2007-11-09 06:20:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by I'm right 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I CAN imagine Rudy losing NY. Al Gore lost his own home state!!!
2007-11-09 05:14:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do not know how she could tale traditionally Republican votes, the dissatisfaction with the current administration will probably be how.
Hillary will take NY in a landslide, the people from NY remember the former Mayor. Not too fondly.
2007-11-09 05:49:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Rudy could easily lost NY. His support there is limited mostly to the elite.
2007-11-09 05:13:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Showtunes 6
·
1⤊
1⤋