English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-09 04:38:15 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Studbolt, isn't it obvious? They are controlled by the same elite,

Do you know Rupert Murdoch holds fundraisers for Hellery CLinton?'

They want Fascists, they don't want any true traditional conservatives.

2007-11-09 04:47:45 · update #1

Lloyd, who says he's not legitimate?
The mainstream media? It's BS...
His fan base was able to get everyone to contribute and raised him 4.2 million in ONE DAY.

You will NOT see that type of community action support for Gooouliani or Clintoon,

He is a force to be recon with, I'm sorry you are in the dark about what is going on in the U.S. but it's a media blackout.

2007-11-09 04:49:54 · update #2

Captain: I know, that's why liberal is in quotations...

2007-11-09 04:51:15 · update #3

16 answers

it's not so much a liberal media as an OWNED media

2007-11-09 04:44:35 · answer #1 · answered by captain_koyk 5 · 3 0

Liberal media? Maybe you should say republican owned media. Ron Paul is more conservative than the backed republicans by the corporations which are not going to get the monopolies that they have under the Bush administration. Corporations are backing most of the politics in both parties. The two that do not have their backing is Ron Paul and John edwards. Just a FYI for you most media is bought and sold by corporations that controls what is put in the papers. Take Murdoch for example while in england he has helped elect their primes through propoganda in the newspapers and on TV. Media is not liberal but you need to read non-corporation owned papers and Tv to get the truth.

2007-11-09 04:49:17 · answer #2 · answered by john a 6 · 3 0

I proceed to hearken to Ron's message. I donate money to his marketing campaign and that i've got yet to locate something detrimental or distateful approximately him. I only could prepare on the small screen television to be certain some thing distasteful approximately certainly one of the different brainless turds. November 2008, write in's!!! that's extremely possible! only stay good and committed, we are able to try this! we are able to alter the worldwide. we are able to be a extensive area of arising historic past RON PAUL 2008.

2016-11-10 22:45:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Give some evidence of this please?
It appears more like the right-wing neocons are smearing him to make him less competition for the fanatic, Romney.

Personally, Ron paul is the guy who is getting my vote if he gets the nomination. If he doesn't, I'm voting for any democrat that gets it.

correction.... They want globalists, they don't want any true traditional conservatives OR liberals.

2007-11-09 04:54:21 · answer #4 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1 0

Are they? I don't care what they say. I like Ron Paul.

I like Dennis Kucinich for President though but I would love to see Ron Paul as his running mate.

Ron Paul is not an idiot. He went to medical school. You cannot be an idiot and get into medical school. He graduated from it and they don't graduate idiots. What he says makes sense. The question may be whether or not it can be implemented. How much support will he get, that's another one.

2007-11-09 04:45:39 · answer #5 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 2 0

Funny, I saw him being interviewed on PBS - imagine that, Ron Paul being interviewed by what many on the right to be the most liberal media - right there in front of god and everybody!

You must have missed it because you were too busy complaining about the liberal media!

2007-11-09 04:45:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

He is the biggest risk to stealing moderate and inde[endate votes he is this election cycles Ralph Nader

2007-11-09 04:41:44 · answer #7 · answered by Tip 5 · 0 2

In what way...if you are referring to them not giving a lot of coverage to a second tier candidate, they also arent giving coverage to Monroe "Volcanoe Man" Lee either

List of all candidates
http://www.dcpoliticalreport.com/pres08.htm

2007-11-09 04:42:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

colbert gravel kucinich paul nader [conyers?] united for truth elicit fear smear blacklist.

honesty compassion intelligence guts...

2007-11-09 18:18:21 · answer #9 · answered by NadePaulKuciGravMcKi 3 · 0 0

I don't know why Fox News won't treat him as a legitimate candidate, but they don't.

2007-11-09 04:41:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers