English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A new upscale beverage popping up in the hands of executives and movie stars all over the country. It's not surprising that it can be found in swag baskets at the MTV Video Music Awards. The bottle is adorned with Swarovski crystals (or frost/ice?)
Paris Hilton's dog drinks it.
It's called (the ever so tasteful) Bling H2O and it's billed as the "Cristal of Waters."
Can you believe you can taste it at a "water bar.", such as located in Westchester NY?

And these popinjay buffoons are made about to be the role models for todays' youth?

Well, fools and their money are easily parted.

No chance they could spare that same money to help provide safe drinking water to the world's poor is there?

Obviously they're too important, rich and pretentious to be effected by the 3.9 million children dying annually of water-borne disease, such as diarrhea, cholera, diphtheria and typhus.

See now where the seeds of communist sympathy ferments Americans?

2007-11-09 04:25:56 · 18 answers · asked by ? 2 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

18 answers

I would if it were Holy Water blessed by Jesus himself!

2007-11-09 04:28:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First, the communists do not care about their own poor, let alone the world's poor. Or do you consider children working 15 hour days in paint booths without respirators "caring".

Now on to your statements, yes, the people that so many of the WORLD's citizens idolize, and try to copy are, idiots. No argument there. Thinking that American's are the only ones that have citizens like Paris is small minded and bigoted. What about Beck & Posh? McCartney? or any of the millions of the rest of the world's rich?

I ask you though, is it dumber to spend $55 on a bottle of water for your dog when you are worth an estimated $50 million dollars (or 0.0000011 of your total worth) or to spend $20 on a video of the offending "star" when your income is less than $10,000 annually and you own nothing (0.002 of gross worth). So which is the bigger fool.

So you are a commie sympathizer? Try reading about how great life is for the average citizen in a communist country before you go spouting about how great it is. Not to mention that if truly communist, you wouldn't "be allowed" to spout your opinion in forums such as these.

2007-11-09 04:51:24 · answer #2 · answered by Gem 7 · 0 0

No way could I pay $fifty 5 for a bottle of water...it is so stupid. I advise, it in all risk isn't even sturdy water...and additionally our determine is going to be lifeless in fifty 5 years. in case you suspect in God, then that's mentioned that God does each and every thing for a reason, and because God loves us...i think of that possibly, if that's genuine, then there will be a important sparkling out of the planet; floods, fires, storms, you call a organic disaster and we will have it. i think of that if we could've positioned a quit to it, it became an prolonged time in the past. Our planet is falling aside by means of fact people, and we've not have been given any option to fall with it. you spot, i'm answering your question by way of saying this: we will not ought to fret approximately being charged for air, by means of fact we ought to not final that long. (we are additionally killing innocuous and defensless creatures; the place's the justice in that!)

2016-12-16 03:24:19 · answer #3 · answered by ballow 4 · 0 0

I think that spending so much money in a bottle of water is just some other way to slap poverty in the face.
It's just amazing to see how some people is so selfish that if you had money left you just find a creative solution to spend it on you anyway ...and forget about the people that are out of your ¨circle¨:/

2007-11-09 04:37:26 · answer #4 · answered by jueves 4 · 0 0

Absoutly NOT! That is absurde to think people spend that much on water. I seen a news things about that store a couple months back I jsut laughed. Some people reallly are NUTS

2007-11-09 04:29:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I personally would not, under normal circumstances, pay $55 for a bottle of water. I don't even buy the cheap bottled water. I get excellent water from my tap.

Now, strand me in the desert for a couple of days and then ask me the question. I would probably reply "Do you accept VISA?".

2007-11-09 04:29:06 · answer #6 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 2 0

Wow, that is so sad. Did you know that if you have money in your wallet, a bank account, and spare change in a jar somewhere, you are in the top 8% of the world?

2007-11-09 04:29:01 · answer #7 · answered by Nate 2 · 1 0

I wouldn't pay $5 for a bottle of water.

2007-11-09 04:32:18 · answer #8 · answered by p h 6 · 0 0

I wouldn't I don't have 55 dollars to buy a bottle of water.

2007-11-09 04:28:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd never waste my money on something like water.

2007-11-09 05:02:51 · answer #10 · answered by ☆ღWifey Wifeyღ☆ 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers