English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Dog had just been on national television apolizing for his telephone conversation on Larry King's show. He poured his heart out . Then Dr Phil was on the next night and put him down for not coming on his show when asked the next day. I don't blame Dog for not being on Dr. Phil's show with all the other guest on there to be against him.

2007-11-09 04:06:28 · 13 answers · asked by pattypat999 3 in Entertainment & Music Television Reality Television

13 answers

I wouldn't go on Dr.Phill either, he would just be out to knock him around some more. I believed his apology on Larry and I truly think he did not mean any harm.

2007-11-09 04:19:03 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Jen♥ 7 · 1 1

I do think Mr. Chapman should have appeared on Dr. Phil, if only to cement his conviction to mend his language and leave no door open for those to question his sincerity. Remember this guy is in the public eye, wants his show back, not just for himself but the other working members of his Bounty Hunter family. Sure, he didn't have to go, but it would have gone a long way with his critics if he faced his detractors and not merely a more neutral and benign Larry King.
Having said this, Dog should get his show reinstated. Everyone deserves a second chance; this was a private conversation sold to the highest bidder and I am convinced Dog is no racist, but I believe a product of the inflammatory language used in the prison system. Foul expletives can become a terrible habit - just look at the "F" bombs dropped everywhere today. No doubt Dog was furious during that conversation -I've seen his temper on the BH - and those terrible words flew out. How many countless private conversations, if made public, would bring down other celebs, I wonder??
But it seems to me, cancelling his show is not a positive move in light of the justice and good work he provides. Dog brought the repercussions of this ugly and totally unacceptable term to the forefront -I believe he learned a lesson and let's move on and let him catch more criminals.

2007-11-10 02:08:36 · answer #2 · answered by Casey B 1 · 0 2

I would've made the appearance if I were him. I'm sure Dr. Phil would've lent a compassionate ear, like he sometimes does, and give him a chance to explain his peace. Some people who watch Dr. Phil may not have seen the Larry King interview. I'm sure Dr. Phil could've also given Dog advice on whether or not he should reconcile with Tucker, and how.

Dog should've sent someone else who knows about this call to appear on Dr. Phil on his behalf, perhaps Beth or Leland or Duane Lee.

2007-11-09 06:09:49 · answer #3 · answered by Sharon Newman (YR) Must Die 7 · 0 2

OK...Dog did wrong, and he has apologized. Whether everyone accepts it or not is not the problem. His jerk son is the one who should apologize. Maybe Dr. Phil should have this kid on his show and ask him what his problem is "selling out his family". Money, it's always about the money. I hope his son saves this money he made from this, for if A & E cancels Dog the Bounty Hunter, then how is Tucker going to live, since he had no problem living off his dad's success in the past!

2007-11-09 06:08:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

With desktops and video games, you ask? young babies do no longer ought to stroll to college anymore, or play exterior. they simply ought to sit down down in front of a show screen to entertain themselves. sure, that's a wellness situation. I examine on Yahoo solutions, some months lower back; that human beings in different international places, can consistently tell American travelers from different travelers, because of the fact they are so obese. This struck a chord with me and that i haven't forgotten it. although I do have self assurance there are some that are merely made to be extra on the healthful area. we gained't all be skinny like mooses! i became skinny till a pair of twelve months in the past! yet howdy, grannys are meant to be a 'little' on the plump area. :D

2016-10-01 23:29:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't blame him either. I wouldn't go on Dr. Phil's show if I knew that all of the guests were against me. I don't think that Dr. Phil would go on Dr. Phil's show if he were in Dog's shoes.

2007-11-10 03:37:30 · answer #6 · answered by blackbeauty_19890 3 · 2 1

Enough already! Ok Dog said a bad thing, Have you ever said anything horrible that you didn't mean? We all have! lets get over it and move on. I don't think Dog needs to here yet again what a horrible thing he said from Dr. Phil. I wouldn't go on either!

2007-11-09 06:16:37 · answer #7 · answered by mustng44 3 · 2 1

I agree Mr. Chapman made the right choice to NOT be on Dr. Phil.

CONGRATULATIONS TO DUANE, TIM, LELAND AND THE WHOLE FAMILY. It is about time the Mexico thing is over. It never should of happened in the first place. Mrs. Beth Chapman ~ congratulations to you for staying so strong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I first heard the short version and just now got to hear the long version of this phone conversation between Tucker and Mr. Chapman. I hear a Father disciplining a son (Tucker Chapman) whose girlfriend (Monique Shinnery) was making threats and stirring up problems between the family members prior to this tape recording.

It is extremely obvious Mr. Chapman was correct in his assessment of the whole situation concerning his son Tucker and his girlfriend Monique. While Mr. Chapman is talking to his son ~ the very son ~ who is secretly recording this conversation is lying to his Dad on this tape about his girlfriend Monique's intentions BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT JUST HIS GIRLFRIENDS INTENTIONS ~ OBVIOUSLY!!!

Shame on A&E and Black leaders for getting involved and promoting a rebellious son.

What I don't get is how Tucker is swearing that Monique wouldn't do something like this and accusing everyone involved of lying about Monique trying to do this BUT HE IS SITTING THERE DOING EXACTLY WHAT HIS FATHER AND EVERYONE ELSE felt Monique was trying to do.

My goodness give some credibility to Mr. Chapman for calling a spade a spade.

He obviously should of cut his son out a lot sooner but as most fathers wanted to believe in his children. He just thought it was LOVE that was causing his son to not see clearly when in truth Tucker and Monique are both being troublemakers.

Tucker Chapman and Monique Shinnery need to apologize publicly for getting paid to release a private conversation and ALL the things they did prior to this conversation that was causing problems within this family.

As far as this girlfriend goes (since it is obvious she don't like her boyfriends family) she should do like all the other girlfriends who don't like their in-laws or in her case her boyfriends family ~STAY AWAY FROM THEM.

2007-11-10 01:04:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Dog just needs to say his peace, which he did. He does not need to go on every show just because they ask him. He spoke his mind and now should give it some time instead of dragging it out.

2007-11-09 04:43:23 · answer #9 · answered by justasking 5 · 3 0

Enough of this media hype. It was a private conversation!!!! Lets stop with the lynching. He was right not to go on that creeps show. Just sensationalism!!!! At its worse, just words, let it go....

2007-11-09 04:26:37 · answer #10 · answered by GreatNeck 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers