Yes, if you were the woman i came home to.
2007-11-09 04:28:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by slap happy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think so, as one racism was far easier to discriminate on as you can clearly see if someone is black, however with a gay actor, how many LGBTs actors have actually come out? There's the odd few but not many and it would be just as discriminating to advertise a role with the phrase "homosexuals only". And you also can get LGBTs playing straight roles, for example, Barney Stinson (I don't know the actors name) in How I Met Your Mother, it is firstly a high profile role, so no oppression on getting a high profile and it is basically what you just said but opposite.
2016-05-28 22:47:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if he was wearing a pink dress, nylons, high heels and a garter belt while deer hunting in Northern Wisconsin.
2007-11-09 03:16:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope and I wouldn't watch a movie like 'Broke back Mountain' either. Being gay is just not tasteful to me but being gay and in the country just sends all kinds of insane irregular electric signals through the synapse. It hurts.
2007-11-09 03:21:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't see why not, it's just a movie. And as long as it pays the bills, I could care less.
2007-11-09 03:15:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kevin H 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
it would have to be 30 million or more but I heard they did more than kiss in that movie....
2007-11-09 03:10:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I asked my husband...his response:
"Sure...I can buy a lot of mouthwash for a million bucks"
2007-11-09 03:13:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by LaVere B 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sure. Heck, for few million, I would let him violate my bum.
2007-11-09 03:10:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
never. not for any money.
2007-11-09 03:10:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by ronny 2
·
3⤊
2⤋