Isn't Calling Hillary Bush Light is Like Calling Hitler, Another Billy Graham?
2007-11-09 02:52:49 · 22 answers · asked by Moody Red 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sherilynne B: President Bush has done many wonderful things as an Evangelical president just the opposite of Hillary, like Graham is as opposite as Hitler.
2007-11-09 03:13:57 · update #1
Sherilynne B: President Bush has done many wonderful things as an Evangelical president just the opposite of Hillary, like Graham is as opposite as Hitler.
2007-11-09 03:14:30 · update #2
I really feel no US politicians (including Hillary) can realistically be compared to Hitler in any way. i do see you point though, the contrasts could hardly be more stark.
George W is a mostly humble man, not well spoken, but is a leader who works hard for what he believes is the best thing for America.
Hillary is an egotistical, well spoken, unashamed, power hungry politician who will do whatever it takes to do what she feels is best for Hillary.
2007-11-09 03:06:45 · answer #1 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 9⤊ 5⤋
No. Bush is a horrible president that is bad for the nation and the world at large. Hillary doesn't seem much unlike this. Hillary would make horrible decisions just as Bush has.
2007-11-09 03:29:16 · answer #2 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary will be compared to anyone or anything that will gain her votes. What I like is how the left wing Liberal media is trying to encourage a third party to split the Republican vote and thus Queen Hillary the Socialist will win.
2007-11-09 04:51:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is a Socialist with Marxist leanings.
George is less than competent.
At least Bush isn't DELIBERATELY anti-American!
2007-11-09 11:52:19 · answer #4 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Moody Red, get with the program, Hillary is Pro War, the Dems have signed on to war on Iran,,
The Bush/Clinton dynasty is exactly that, that's why I'm certain she will win.
The bushes and the Clintons are just like Clinton and Gooouliani,
not much difference AT ALL.
Bill Clinton was a Fascist Darling and did what Reagan and Bush wanted him to do (or should I say the oil/banking cartels wanted him to do, because after all they are mere puppets for the NWO).
He gave us NAFTA, Waco is a sign of things to come...he merely set the stage for Bush just as Dubya will set the stage for Hillary,
with another rigged election, false flag attack, martial law and hillary as fiat dictator.
Bush is a FAKE conservative, he's probably not Christian or against anything he says he is,
he's more on the lines of NWO Bilderberger Clintons....it's all the same crap.
Get informed about what's going on and wake up.
2007-11-09 03:07:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
i could think of them as job applicants at an interview. enable's additionally think of their resumes are clean and we interviewers have no concept who they 'rather' are. Now what might we are saying approximately them whilst they might flow away the room? George: He seems to be a down-to-earth guy, likeable, ordinary to get alongside with, a collection participant. If our enterprise may be in a no brainer enterprise (e.g. FMCG, uncooked components, motor vehicle) and the overpowering majority of our consumers adult males, we'd hire him for sales. If he proves himself, he might have the aptitude to alter into head of sales sometime. Hilary: She is objective-oriented, knows what she needs and is working perplexing to get there. a resounding talker, demands admire. larger administration fabric, in all threat strategic progression, HR (or given her actually historic past, legal dept). If she proves herself she could substitute into CEO. *** George has already shown his sales skills, hasn't he? The question now could be if Hilary has shown herself adequate to be promoted to CEO, or if there isn't a greater suitable candidate for that place.
2016-09-28 21:40:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they are serious, I know I am when I compare them. I think it is a valid comparison, she is running for president and it is normal to compare her and other candidates to current and past presidents. My opinion is that she is very like Bush in that they both are power hungry, egotistical liars and will do anything to get their own way.
Sorry, I don't understand your Hitler-Graham comparison or see how it relates to Clinton-Bush comparison.
2007-11-09 03:01:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
The drive by media needs to make people think she is nice.
Which they also think we are stupid like the many mindless robots who think global warming is due to man.
2007-11-09 03:44:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No Hillary is much more like Hitler.
2007-11-09 02:56:07 · answer #9 · answered by ken 6 · 11⤊ 3⤋
Actually it's more like Hillary to Hitler, that's why she got the nick name Hitlery.
2007-11-09 03:04:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 3⤋