a lot of people will make a lot of money off this case, just look at all the millionaire's he made last time. who do u think will make a lot?
2007-11-09 02:27:42 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yes...because I really think it's an easy case for easy money...I don't think the state has a good case. They're making plea deals just to get the other shady characters to testify against O.J. It's a witch-hunt. Believe me I'm not an O.J. fan, but it sounds, smells and looks like entrapment.
2007-11-09 02:59:30 · answer #1 · answered by Fern O 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would prosecute. His violent behavior, and the vicious crime he admitted to committing through his book would be heavy enough evidence to give me a doubt as to his innocence. The arrogance, and disrespect that he has shown for the judicial system, and his so called fans has apparently led him to a misguided belief that because he was a star 20 years ago, he does not have to respect the laws.
The evidence is clear that Mr. Simpson planned this armed robbery, and though he may not have held a gun in his own hand, was aware that guns would be present.
Mr. Simpson is a menace to society and should be locked up for life, before he kills more than just the two people he was aquited for. Then wrote a book on how he did it.
I believe that he was aquited because of his race, and social status. Those were the main claims by his legal council as to the cause for him being charged for two murders, that there was more than enough evidence to convict him on.
I watched his trial every day, and his smirk made it clear each day that he knew because he was black the black community would come to his rescue. And, because he was a star people who adore him would never convict.
If I had killed two people, and was let off for those two reasons alone, which he was, I would have no fear of, or respect for the law either. Beyond the murder charges, he fled and evaded the police, and was never charged for it.
This man commits crime after crime with no reprocusions. This can not continue. I would prosecute without a doubt.
2007-11-09 02:49:32 · answer #2 · answered by cloudchaser1964 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if he hired me id have no choice but to defend him. however i would like to be on the prosecution team! ... i think in this case prosecution will make more because he doesnt have any money for a good lawyer anyway! haha
I mean there was a well thought out plan BEFORE he broke in for "his memorablia" - so that shows precognition.
If he didn't murder her why would he have written a book telling how he would have? Poor taste?
2007-11-09 02:30:50 · answer #3 · answered by Happily Hippy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You make a lot more money defending than prosecuting, generally. Prosecutors are paid by the government, defense lawyers are paid by the defendant.
Unless you could prosecute, then parlay that into a half *** career change like Marcia whatsername did, or write a book or something.
2007-11-09 02:37:56 · answer #4 · answered by Ginger R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would do my job. If I was a prosecutor I would do that, if I was a defense lawyer I would... probably not take him as a client.
Which millionaires? The prosecutors failed so miserably I don't think they made any money, even off book sales and his defense lawyers were never paid. Where's the money?
2007-11-09 02:38:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
By defending him, you get your money directly. By prosecuting him, you have to hope for a book deal or some type of reality show after the case.
So I would defend him and take all his cash and get him the lightest sentence i could get him.
2007-11-09 02:36:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What replace into not in any respect further out interior the trial replace into the actuality that that comprehensive agency replace into approximately drugs and the actuality that O.J.'s spouse owed something like 2 hundred grand for coke and O.J. does not pay the invoice - the super ingredient replace into to maintain the FBI from getting in touch by way of fact if that they had that comprehensive drug agency could of come to the fore and the actuality that an outstanding deal of human beings in L.A. are in touch in it to contain law enforcement officers, judges and picture stars.
2017-01-05 03:57:22 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prosecution, because then I could make the jump into lucrative TV commentator deals.
Besides, OJ seems to have a thing about not paying what he owes. There's that matter of a judgment in California...
2007-11-09 02:42:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would defend him. I think he needed it. I am not convinced that he did the murder. I would be interested to know what the prosecution actually knew, though.
2007-11-09 02:34:31 · answer #9 · answered by SithLord 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would defend him and do a terrible job
2007-11-09 02:34:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋